The term ‘Thume’ — encountered across the corpus most consistently as the Greek thumos (θυμός) — occupies a charged and contested position in depth-psychological scholarship. In early Greek epic, as Caswell’s exhaustive philological study establishes, thumos is the most prolific of all psychic entities, appearing over 750 times in Homer, functioning simultaneously as locus, instrument, and energetic source of action within the person. Sullivan confirms its primacy as the vibrant organ of motivated selfhood, noting that its range exceeds that of noos or phrenes. Etymologically, Onians linked it to Latin fumus via shared connotations of breath, vapor, and smoke, tracing a lineage from physical combustion to psychic fire. Hobbs attends to Plato’s methodological question of whether thumos names a quality, an emotion, or a formal part of the tripartite psuche — a distinction with lasting consequences. Peterson’s depth-psychological reconstruction is the most polemically ambitious: he argues that Plato’s surgery on the Homeric thumos — reducing it from sovereign deliberative partner to mere auxiliary of logos — initiated a structural repression whose consequences persist into modernity. The loss of the Middle Voice, he contends, deprived Western psychology of the very grammatical scaffolding that made thumotic self-regulation articulable. For Peterson, recovering the thumos means recovering the capacity for transformative suffering — the Middle Voice stance between mastery and annihilation.