Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘convergence’ operates across markedly distinct registers that nonetheless share a structural family resemblance: the meeting of pressures, signals, or forces at a single point that produces qualitative transformation. In Peterson’s Homeric-Jungian phenomenology, convergence names the existential condition by which mortality’s irreducible constraints—permanent loss, radical uncertainty, utter powerlessness—press upon the thumotic vessel simultaneously, forging character through sustained endurance rather than relief or escape. The gods cannot access this condition; only mortal embodiment can be constituted by it. In Damasio’s neurobiological architecture, convergence-divergence zones (CDZs) are the cortical mechanisms by which disparate sensory representations are brokered into unified body-self mappings, the neural analog of what depth psychology would call integration. Merleau-Ponty invokes convergence phenomenologically as the perceptual sign of depth and distance, already embedded in a ‘natural geometry’ prior to thematization. Craig identifies neuroimaging convergence in the anterior insular cortex as the substrate for maternal affective attunement. The term thus traverses ontology, neuroscience, and phenomenology, functioning in each domain as the site where difference becomes meaningful through meeting — whether that meeting is catastrophic, integrative, or generative. The most philosophically charged usage remains Peterson’s, where convergence is not merely a structural event but the very forge of psychic substance.