The Middle Voice occupies a distinctive position within the depth-psychology corpus, appearing principally across two registers: the rigorous linguistic analysis of Rutger Allan’s systematic study of Ancient Greek polysemy, and the psycho-philosophical appropriation pursued by Cody Peterson in his recovery of the thumotic soul. Allan’s treatment is fundamentally semantic and typological, arguing that the Greek middle voice constitutes a polysemous network unified by the abstract schema of ‘subject-affectedness’—the subject functions simultaneously as Initiator and Endpoint of the action. Eleven distinguishable middle uses (passive, spontaneous process, mental process, body motion, collective motion, reciprocal, direct reflexive, perception, mental activity, speech act, indirect reflexive) are mapped onto a semantic network whose prototype is the mental process middle. Peterson’s contribution shifts the register entirely: drawing on Benveniste and Barthes, he reads the erosion of the middle voice in the Latin West as a structural loss of the grammatical scaffolding required to sustain interior deliberation—the thumotic capacity to act upon oneself. For Peterson, the middle voice is not merely a grammatical category but the syntactic correlate of inwardness itself; its disappearance from Western languages is implicated in the collapse of the psychic middle ground between agent and patient. The tension between these positions—analytical and therapeutic—marks the conceptual stakes of the term for depth-psychological inquiry.