Uncontrollable reminiscence welled up and overwhelmed him… what he now showed was a genuine, if uncontrollable, ‘reminiscence’. He now knew the minutest details of the murder: all the details revealed by forensic examination, but never revealed in open court.
Sacks argues that ‘reminiscence’ in its strict Jacksonian sense denotes veridical, hypermnetic memory breaking through involuntarily with overwhelming and sometimes unbearable force.
, The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat, 1985thesis