Anamnesis — from the Greek for ‘unforgetting’ or ‘recollection’ — occupies a distinctive and layered position in the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as a clinical procedure, a Platonic epistemological doctrine, and a mytho-ritual act of psychic reconstitution. Edinger is the corpus’s most sustained expositor, drawing an explicit line from Plato’s Phaedo and the Meno — where learning is recollection of prenatal knowledge — through the physician’s case-history intake, and finally to the analytical encounter with the collective unconscious. For Edinger, anamnesis names the fundamental activity of analysis at every depth: it begins as personal history-taking, opens into Platonic recovery of archetypal forms, and at its furthest reach becomes ‘recollections of the race.’ Jung employs the term in its strictly clinical register — the anamnestic method of psychiatry — but his practice implies the deeper resonance Edinger makes explicit. Vernant situates anamnesis within the Pythagorean-Platonic cosmology of the soul’s cyclic journey, where recollection of previous lives enables escape from the ‘wheel of births.’ Harrison places it at the conjunction of oracle and initiation under the heading Mnemosyne and Anamnesis, anchoring the concept in archaic Greek religious practice. Edinger’s reading of Jung’s Mysterium Coniunctionis adds a ritual dimension: the ‘ritual anamnesis’ of the Anthropos that restores fertility, paralleling the analytical case history as a quasi-sacred restorative act. The central tension across the corpus is whether anamnesis is primarily a recovery of the personal past or an awakening to transpersonal, archetypal, and even cosmological memory.