Narrative therapy enters the depth-psychology corpus not as a unified clinical school but as a convergence zone where constructivist epistemology, archetypal poetics, and trauma processing theory meet around a shared conviction: that human beings are story-making creatures, and that the revision of stories constitutes a primary vector of healing. Neimeyer’s constructivist framework supplies the most systematic theoretical grounding, invoking Sarbin’s ‘narratory principle’ to argue that selfhood is simultaneously authored, written, and critically reviewed. Hillman approaches the same territory from an entirely different angle, treating the therapeutic encounter itself as a collaborative fiction, the case history as a genre of soul-making, and the therapist as a co-author who enters a pre-existing story and alters its slant. Singer locates narrative therapy within the broader emergence of narrative identity research as a subdiscipline linking personality psychology, psychoanalysis, and humanistic inquiry. Flores demonstrates how the life-story functions institutionally within AA, where narrated self-disclosure becomes the vehicle of identity reorganization. Bowlby scholarship connects narrative to autobiographical competence as a constituent of secure attachment. Across these positions, a central tension persists: whether narrative is primarily a cognitive-constructive tool, a relational-intersubjective event, or an archetypal-imaginal activity. That tension is itself generative, marking narrative therapy as one of the most philosophically productive concepts in the contemporary depth-psychological literature.