Constructivism

Pervading constructivist metatheory is a position of epistemological humility, a recognition that, whatever the status of an external reality, its meaning for us is determined by our constructions of its significance, rather than the 'brute facts' themselves.

Neimeyer articulates the foundational epistemological premise of constructivism — that experiential meaning is constituted by the construing subject, not read off from an independent reality — and traces it to Kantian philosophy.

Neimeyer, Robert A, Meaning Reconstruction and the Experience of Lossthesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

The helper must enter the individual's uniquely constructed world and repair and strengthen this world from within. To the extent that the individual constructs the world religiously and to the extent that these constructions are a source of problems or potential solutions, religion becomes an appropriate topic of conversation for the constructivist.

Pargament defines the constructivist therapeutic stance as entering the client's personally constructed meaning-world — including its religious dimensions — without imposing external normative standards of correct belief.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001thesis

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

religious orientation of, 360-371 constructivism, 362t, 366-369; exclusivism, 362t, 364-366; pluralism, 362t, 369-371; rejectionism, 362t, 362-364

Pargament situates constructivism within a four-part typology of helper orientations toward religion, distinguishing it from exclusivism, pluralism, and rejectionism as a distinct epistemological and clinical stance.

Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

constructive/synthetic approach 29–30, 32–5, 33; to dreams 253, 254; constructivism 167–9

The Jungian handbook differentiates Jung's own constructive-synthetic interpretive method from constructivism as a broader epistemological position, mapping their related but distinct domains within the analytic literature.

Papadopoulos, Renos K., The Handbook of Jungian Psychology: Theory, Practice and Applications, 2006supporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Constructivist thinking in counseling practice, research, and training

Bibliographic citations to Neimeyer, Mahoney, and associated volumes confirm constructivism's established presence as an organized clinical-theoretical movement informing grief therapy and loss research.

Neimeyer, Robert A, Meaning Reconstruction and the Experience of Losssupporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Constructivism in psychotherapy (pp. 231–246). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Repeated citation of the Neimeyer-Mahoney edited volume establishes constructivism in psychotherapy as a primary reference point for trauma, grief, and narrative approaches within the corpus.

Neimeyer, Robert A, Meaning Reconstruction and the Experience of Losssupporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

Limits and lessons of constructivism: Some critical reflections. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 8, 339–361.

Neimeyer's self-critical engagement with the limits of constructivism signals that the tradition is not monolithic and that its proponents acknowledge genuine epistemic and clinical constraints.

Neimeyer, Robert A, Meaning Reconstruction and the Experience of Losssupporting

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →

constructivism 143

Gallagher's index reference to constructivism in the context of embodied cognition indicates that the term surfaces as a counterpoint to dynamic-systems and body-based accounts of how the mind shapes experience.

Gallagher, Shaun, How the Body Shapes the Mind, 2005aside

Expand passageDig deeper with Sebastian →