Reflexivity

reflexive response · psychological reflection

Reflexivity occupies a distinctive and contested position within the depth-psychology corpus, spanning registers from neurological automatism to philosophical self-constitution. At one extreme, reflexivity designates the pre-volitional, hardwired arc of stimulus and response — the orienting reflex, the defensive automatism, the procedural tendency that bypasses deliberate agency. Ogden’s sensorimotor framework and van der Hart’s structural-dissociation model both situate such reflexive action tendencies at the base of a developmental hierarchy, against which the capacity for genuine reflection marks a higher, harder-won integrative achievement. At the other extreme, Ricoeur’s phenomenological hermeneutics recasts reflexivity as a philosophical problem of self-reference: the ‘I’ that designates itself in utterance, the sui-reference that binds reflexive pronoun to identifying reference in the constitution of selfhood. Between these poles, Welwood maps ‘psychological reflection’ as an intermediate practice — neither the primitive automatism of unreflective identification nor the nondual presence of contemplative awakening — arguing for its indispensable bridging function. The central tension in the corpus is therefore between reflexivity as automatism (something the organism does before the self can intervene) and reflexivity as the very structure through which a self becomes available to itself. This tension carries direct clinical weight: trauma treatment depends precisely on converting compulsive reflexive response into reflective, integrative action.

In the library

the complete analysis of the reflexivity implied in acts of utterance can be carried through only if a particular kind of referential value can be attributed to this reflexivity

Ricoeur argues that linguistic reflexivity — the self-designating ‘I’ — requires a referential anchor, making reflexivity constitutive rather than merely grammatical in the formation of selfhood.

Ricoeur, Paul, Oneself as Another, 1992thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the notion of sui-reference, whose coherence we questioned earlier, is in fact of a mixed nature, resulting from the interconnection of reflexivity and identifying reference

Ricoeur demonstrates that self-reference is a hybrid structure — neither pure reflexivity nor pure identification — governing all indexical functioning of language and underpinning the philosophical account of the self.

Ricoeur, Paul, Oneself as Another, 1992thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Some intermediate action tendencies are reflexive, and involve impulsive beliefs. Others are more reflective. These more sophisticated action tendencies involv

Van der Hart’s action-hierarchy explicitly distinguishes reflexive tendencies (impulsive, automatic) from reflective ones, establishing the developmental and clinical gap between them as the locus of trauma treatment.

Hart, Onno van der, The Haunted Self Structural Dissociation and the Treatmentthesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

This progress was attributed to her capacity to reflect upon the reflexive tendencies and practice new, more complex actions that involved relaxation of both core and periphery

Ogden presents the clinical goal of sensorimotor therapy as the capacity to reflect upon and thereby transform compulsive reflexive tendencies into integrated, adaptive action.

Ogden, Pat, Trauma and the Body: A Sensorimotor Approach to Psychotherapy, 2006thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

By providing an intermediate step between conventional psychological reflection and the deeper process of meditation, this way of working has proved to be more congruent with my meditative experience

Welwood positions psychological reflection as a necessary middle term between unreflective identification and nondual presence, assigning it a specific and irreplaceable therapeutic-spiritual function.

Welwood, John, Toward a Psychology of Awakening Buddhism, Psychotherapy,, 2000thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Therapy helps clients raise their integrative capacity to the level at which they can discover, initiate, execute, and complete these mental and physical actions that require reflection, inhibition of defensive tendencies, self-awareness, affect regulation

Ogden frames therapeutic progress as the development of integrative capacity sufficient to replace reflexive defensive patterns with reflective, self-aware action.

Ogden, Pat, Trauma and the Body: A Sensorimotor Approach to Psychotherapy, 2006supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

it is important to understand the uses and limitations of psychological reflection, and to study its role as a stepping-stone both toward and ‘back’ from nondual presence

Welwood argues that psychological reflection functions as a bidirectional bridge — toward contemplative depth and back toward embodied integration — whose limitations are as important to grasp as its uses.

Welwood, John, Toward a Psychology of Awakening Buddhism, Psychotherapy,, 2000supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

for the reflexive inquiry, however, the person is considered primarily in terms of the third person, the one of whom someone speaks

Ricoeur contrasts the referential and reflexive modes of inquiry into personhood, showing that the reflexive approach privileges the self-designating subject over the third-person entity of semantic description.

Ricoeur, Paul, Oneself as Another, 1992supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The idea, then, with regard to psychotherapy technique, is to engender self-reflection. Different individuals vary greatly in their capacity for self-reflection.

Cooper identifies the cultivation of self-reflection as the central technical aim shared by Buddhist practice and psychoanalytic work, noting that this capacity varies substantially and must be developed carefully.

Cooper, Seiso Paul, Zen Insight, Psychoanalytic Action: Two Arrows Meeting, 2019supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

They also permitted her to reflect on how the specific meaning of an interaction had dual layers: her appraisal of its significance in the moment and its parallel historical meanings for her

Siegel illustrates reflexive self-monitoring as the therapeutic acquisition of a dual temporal awareness — present appraisal and historical resonance — made possible by linking primary emotion to consciousness.

Siegel, Daniel J., The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are, 2020supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

While phenomenological reflection is an attempt to find new meaning, new understanding, new directions, meditation is a more radical path of undoing, which involves relaxing any tendency to become caught up in feelings, thoughts, and identifications

Welwood draws a precise distinction between phenomenological reflection, which seeks new meaning, and meditative practice, which suspends all meaning-seeking — establishing the boundary conditions of reflexivity as a psychological operation.

Welwood, John, Toward a Psychology of Awakening Buddhism, Psychotherapy,, 2000supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

higher-order mental abilities, such as the ability to reflect on experience, weigh the possible effect of our actions, challenge maladaptive actions, and contemplate how we might act differently

Ogden situates the capacity for reflection within a developmental hierarchy of action, characterizing it as an advanced integrative achievement distinguishable from the automatic action tendencies that precede it.

Ogden, Pat, Trauma and the Body: A Sensorimotor Approach to Psychotherapy, 2006supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

in chapter 8 on the topic of token-reflexivity, the author writes, ‘Someone’s utterance of this sentence, the fact that someone says this, is an event that occurs, as do all events, at a certain time and in a certain place’

Ricoeur references the analytic concept of token-reflexivity — the event-character of utterance — as part of his broader account of how self-reference is anchored in the temporal and spatial particularity of speech acts.

Ricoeur, Paul, Oneself as Another, 1992aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

To reclaim a self requires making the self available as what Schafer called an audience to its own self-story

Frank invokes Schafer’s concept of self-availability — the self witnessing its own narrative — as a form of reflexive self-constitution required for illness recovery, connecting reflexivity to the politics of embodied storytelling.

Frank, Arthur W., The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics, 1995aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms