Within the depth-psychology and somatic-psychology corpus, ‘Map’ operates on two distinct registers that occasionally intersect. The first is the neurobiological-cartographic: Brodmann’s cytoarchitectonic maps of the cerebral cortex (Damasio), hippocampal spatial maps and place-cell research (Kandel), and the molecular substrates of spatial memory storage. Here the map is a representation of neural topography — a scientific instrument for locating function in tissue. The second, and far more therapeutically active, register belongs to the Polyvagal tradition as elaborated by Dana and Porges, where ‘map’ becomes a clinical practice. The autonomic map — in its Personal Profile, Triggers and Glimmers, and Art Map variants — externalises the three-state hierarchy of the nervous system, making invisible neurobiological process visible and narratable. This therapeutic mapping draws explicitly on both hemispheres: right-brain embodied sensing paired with left-brain language. Murray Stein supplies a third, Jungian valence through the phrase ‘Jung’s Map of the Soul,’ invoking cartography as metaphor for the whole psyche. The productive tension across these registers concerns epistemology: is a map a discovery of pre-existing structure (neural topology, Jungian archetypes) or a co-construction between therapist and client that itself reorganises experience? Dana’s insistence that maps are ‘dynamic, shifting’ favours the latter, while Kandel’s molecular biology favours the former.