In the depth-psychological corpus, the forest operates as one of the most semantically dense and consistently elaborated landscape symbols. Jung establishes the foundational axis: the forest is darkness made spatial, a container of the unconscious, its impenetrability homologous to the opacity of the psyche’s depths. From this Jungian ground, the forest becomes the site of initiatory ordeal, the locus where the unknown must be entered before transformation is possible. Estés amplifies this by reading the forest as the sacred initiatory ground of the Wild Woman archetype — specifically, the homeland of instinctual feminine nature, aligned with ancestral and underworld dimensions (Leuce, the Greek forest of the dead). Bly reads the forest as the domain of the Wild Man, a space of psychic danger that nonetheless must be entered by men seeking authentic identity. Hillman complicates the enchantment motif: the forest as the place where one loses one’s bearings entirely, drawn by anima projection (Huldra) into a fatal disorientation. The medieval literary tradition, as Auerbach observes, assigns the forest the ethical weight of the ‘right way’ — difficult, thorned, but leading to meaningful encounter. Hillman’s alchemical reading further identifies the forest with spiritus silvestris, a wild pneumatic principle threatened by modernity’s deforestation. Abram approaches the forest phenomenologically: dwelling within it long enough dissolves subject–object boundaries until one becomes the forest perceiving itself. The corpus reveals deep consensus that the forest names the threshold between ego-consciousness and the unconscious depths, and that crossing it is the precondition of any genuine psychological transformation.