Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Wild Woman’ functions not merely as a metaphor but as a foundational archetype designating the instinctual, creative, and primordial feminine psyche. Clarissa Pinkola Estés, the term’s most systematic theorist, positions Wild Woman as a universal substrate of women’s psychology — a prototypical inner figure who ‘canalizes through women’ and constitutes nothing less than ‘the health of all women.’ Her treatment is explicitly Jungian in scaffolding yet distinctively mythopoeic in method, deploying fairy tale, folklore, and cross-cultural goddess imagery to argue that this nature is both endangered and indestructible. The primary tension in the corpus runs between suppression and irrepressibility: the Wild Woman is perpetually ‘pushed down’ by culture, ego, and predatory complexes, yet ‘bounds up again’ with equal persistence. A secondary tension concerns the misreading of wildness as chaos — Estés insists the wild nature carries ‘a vast integrity,’ and that recovering it does not mean loss of socialization but rather the establishment of genuine instinctual selfhood. Robert Bly’s parallel construction of the Wild Man provides an instructive masculine counterpoint, though it remains ancillary to Estés’s comprehensive feminine elaboration. The term matters because it reframes psychological health for women as a recovery project — a return to an originary, pre-domesticated wholeness — rather than an achievement of conventional adjustment.