Unconscious

uroboric unconscious · unconsciousness · archetypal psyche · confrontation with the unconscious

The term ‘unconscious’ in the depth-psychological corpus names not a single entity but a contested field of inquiry whose boundaries shift dramatically depending on the theorist. Jung established the foundational distinction between a personal unconscious — populated by repressed or forgotten contents that ‘split off from the conscious mind as an independent complex’ — and a collective unconscious whose archetypal dominants precede and exceed any individual ego. Erich Neumann, developing the Jungian ground in ontogenetic and phylogenetic register, traces consciousness itself as a late achievement wrested from an original uroboric unconsciousness: an undifferentiated state that is not mere privation but the living matrix from which ego, symbol, and culture emerge. James Hillman displaces the unconscious as primary category in favor of the archetypal image, insisting that psychic life rests upon imaginal organs rather than a subterranean reservoir. John Welwood, approaching from a Buddhist-psychological standpoint, challenges the entire Western model, arguing that meditation reveals awareness as a unified field in which the division of conscious and unconscious ‘simply does not exist.’ Neuroscientific contributors such as Damasio and Levine import the term into discussions of wakefulness, coma, and nonconscious neural processing, radically recontextualizing what depth psychology had treated as a symbolic interiority. The convergence and collision of these positions makes ‘unconscious’ one of the most generative — and most unstable — concepts in the library.

In the library

Even today we can see from primitives that the law of gravity, the inertia of the psyche, the desire to remain unconscious, is a fundamental human trait.

Neumann argues that unconsciousness is not a deficiency but an originary gravitational pull of the psyche that precedes and resists the emergence of ego-consciousness.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The cardinal discovery of transpersonal psychology is that the collective psyche, the deepest layer of the unconscious, is the living ground current from which is derived everything to do with a particularized ego possessing consciousness.

Neumann presents the collective unconscious not as absence of mind but as the constitutive ground from which all individuated ego-consciousness is derived and nourished.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

a content of consciousness disappears and cannot be reproduced. The best we can say of it is: the thought (or whatever it was) has become unconscious, or is cut off from consciousness.

Jung offers a deliberately modest epistemological formulation: the unconscious designates contents that have lapsed from conscious availability, not a metaphysical realm requiring bold hypothesis.

Jung, C.G., The Undiscovered Self: With Symbols and the Interpretation of Dreams, 1957thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The unconscious, therefore, consists in the first place of a multitude of temporarily obscured thoughts, impressions, and images that, in spite of being lost, continue to influence our conscious minds.

Jung defines the unconscious functionally as a repository of temporarily inaccessible contents that nonetheless exert ongoing influence upon conscious life.

Jung, C.G., Collected Works Volume 18: The Symbolic Life, 1976thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

They, too, are pure projections of the collective unconscious upon the remotest possible object — the heavens. Since there is as yet no developed ego consciousness, nor any effective individuality, there can be no relation between man and the cosmic events.

Neumann identifies the great mythological deities as projections of an undifferentiated collective unconscious, arising prior to the individuality required for genuine human-divine relation.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

To associate the unconscious only with the pleasure principle, as opposed to the reality principle, is proof of a depreciating tendency and corresponds to a conscious defense mechanism.

Neumann disputes the Freudian reduction of the unconscious to the pleasure principle, arguing instead that instincts and archetypes command a superior reality-orientation.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The uncanniness of all such neurotic and psychotic manifestations — which correspond to a ‘dysfunction’ of the ego — lies in this grinning, triumphant presence of the unconscious.

Neumann characterizes neurotic and psychotic states as moments where the unconscious overwhelms the ego, displaying an autonomous and triumphant agency of its own.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Among the basic phenomena characteristic of the uroboric existence of the group and the submersion of each part in the group psyche is the government of the group by the dominants of the collective unconscious, by the archetypes, and by instincts.

Neumann traces group psychology to collective unconscious dominants — archetypes and instincts — that govern individuals submerged in the uroboric mass psyche.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Meditation reveals awareness as a unified field, where strict divisions between subject and object, inner and outer, or conscious and unconscious simply do not exist.

Welwood argues that meditative experience dissolves the foundational binary of conscious and unconscious, requiring a wholly new psychological framework beyond the Western model.

Welwood, John, Toward a Psychology of Awakening Buddhism, Psychotherapy,, 2000thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The autonomy of the unconscious reigns supreme in the mass psyche with the collusion of the mass shadow-man who lurks in the unconscious personality, and for the time being at least there is no sign of the regulating intervention of centroversion.

Neumann distinguishes the regressive modern mass-unconscious from the archaic group unconscious, identifying the former as pathological chaos rather than a developmental matrix.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

At this stage, consciousness has not yet wrested any firm foothold from the flood of unconscious being. For the primitive ego, everything is still wrapped in the watery abyss.

Neumann renders early ego-consciousness as a fragile island imperiled by the overwhelming flood of undifferentiated unconscious being, figured through the archetypal image of the primordial ocean.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The ego center gains control over this aggressive tendency of the unconscious and makes it an ego tendency and a content of consciousness.

Neumann describes the developmental achievement by which the ego assimilates and transforms previously autonomous destructive tendencies emanating from the unconscious.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

In the uroboric phase, when ego consciousness has not yet been differentiated into a separate system, centroversion is still identified with the functioning of the body as a whole.

Neumann maps the uroboric phase as a state in which unconscious centroversion operates through bodily totality rather than through a differentiated ego-consciousness.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The archetypal image of uroboric incest is eternally at work, and its effects extend from Leonardo and Goethe right down to our own day.

Neumann posits the uroboric incest image as a timeless unconscious dynamic whose pull toward dissolution and regression is historically traceable across centuries of creative and pathological life.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

In Gnosticism, the way of salvation lies in heightening consciousness and returning to the transcendent spirit, with loss of the unconscious side; whereas uro-

Neumann contrasts the Gnostic solution — conscious transcendence at the cost of the unconscious — with the uroboric framework that holds both poles in dynamic tension.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Just as we may later see the car again, so we come across thoughts that were temporarily lost to us. Thus, part of the unconscious consists of a multitude of temporarily obscured thoughts, impressions, and images.

Jung illustrates the unconscious through the mundane analogy of temporarily lost perceptions, grounding the concept in observable experience before extending it to deeper levels.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Man and His Symbols, 1964supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Dreams can only be understood in terms of the psychology of the dawn period, which, as our dreams show, is still very much alive in us today.

Neumann identifies the dream world as continuous with the archaic unconscious of the dawn period, establishing dreaming as the primary contemporary access-point to primordial psychic strata.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The archetype is the most ontologically fundamental of all Jung’s psychological concepts… Psychic life rests upon these organs; even the self is conceptually subsumed among the archetypes.

Hillman implicitly displaces the unconscious as organizing concept by centering the archetype as the more fundamental ontological ground of psychic life.

Hillman, James, Archetypal Psychology: A Brief Account, 1983supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

in swoon states, where by all human standards there is every guarantee that conscious activity and sense perception are suspended, consciousness, reproducible ideas, acts of judgment, and perceptions can still continue to exist.

Von Franz, citing Jung, presents evidence from syncope states that psychic activity — potentially distinct from ordinary unconsciousness — may persist even when neurological consciousness is suspended.

von Franz, Marie-Louise, Psyche and Matter, 2014supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Inside is projected outside, as we say. In reality there is a ‘psychization’ of the object: everything outside us is experienced symbolically, as though saturated with a content which we co-ordinate with the psyche.

Neumann describes the characteristic mode of the archaic unconscious as ‘psychization,’ wherein inner contents are projected outward and experienced as objective symbolic realities.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms