Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘corpse’ functions as a charged psychic symbol rather than a merely biological fact. The passages assembled here reveal at least four distinct registers in which the term operates. First, as shadow-carrier: von Franz demonstrates that the unburied corpse encountered by the fairy-tale hero embodies unlived shadow-energy that demands the ego’s conscious investment—an insight Bly extends through Murray Stein’s reading of Achilles and Priam, where retrieving the corpse becomes the quintessential ‘ashes work’ of midlife individuation. Second, as alchemical prima materia: von Franz’s reading of the Komarios–Cleopatra text shows the corpse undergoing nigredo dissolution in the tomb, from which the filius philosophorum is reborn—establishing the fundamental analogy between death, putrefaction, and psychic transformation. Third, as ritual threshold between living and dead: Dodds, Rohde, Bremmer, and Onians trace the archaic Greek conflation of corpse and ghost, exposing the primitive refusal to disentangle the material remainder from the animating soul. Fourth, as object of cultural management: the Egyptian mummification rites analyzed by von Franz reveal the corpse as the literal substrate for deification, while the Tibetan corpus (Evans-Wentz) treats its disposal as a precise liturgical operation. Across these registers, the corpse consistently marks the boundary at which psychological, spiritual, and material concerns converge.