Mummification occupies a surprisingly wide semantic field in the depth-psychology corpus, ranging from its literal Egyptian ritual function to its alchemical resonances, its psychoanalytic deployment as a pathological grief-response, and its occasional appearance as a somatic metaphor in clinical description. Von Franz provides the most sustained depth-psychological reading: she argues that Egyptian mummification was not merely a mortuary technology but a concrete act of deification, the corpse bathed in natron (‘neter’—‘god’) and wrapped in linen bandages identified with Isis and Nephthys, thus effecting a literal chemical transformation of the dead into the god Osiris. Alchemical texts, she further notes, explicitly called the treatment of metals ‘mummification,’ embedding the Egyptian ritual logic into the European hermetic tradition. Edinger extends this into the mortificatio operation of alchemy: the Paracelsian mumia—incorruptible bodily residue—becomes a symbol for the Self, the imperishable product of psychic death and renewal. Neumann situates Egyptian embalming within the broader arc of ego-development: the preservation of bodily form against dismemberment reflects the Egyptian intensification of ego-consciousness and the emergence of centroversion. Bowlby, working from an entirely different paradigm, catalogues ‘mummification’ as a clinical term for pathological mourning—the widow or widower who preserves the domestic environment precisely as the dead left it, forestalling grief’s work. Grof reports LSD subjects accessing detailed procedural knowledge of Egyptian mummification during transpersonal sessions. These divergent treatments reveal a term where ritual, alchemical symbolism, developmental psychology, and clinical thanatology converge.