Rites of passage occupy a central and generative position within the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as anthropological datum, archetypal template, and diagnostic lens for contemporary psychological suffering. The foundational tripartite structure articulated by Arnold van Gennep — separation, liminality, incorporation — is received by this corpus not merely as descriptive ethnography but as a map of psychic transformation universally operative across cultures and historical epochs. Victor Turner extends this framework through his analysis of communitas and structural anti-structure, demonstrating how liminal phases dissolve hierarchy and expose bedrock social values. James Hollis applies the concept clinically and culturally, arguing that the collapse of initiatory traditions in modern Western life leaves men psychologically uninitiated, unable to access inner resources or transmit constitutive values. Mircea Eliade anchors the discussion in comparative religion, showing how shamanic initiation rites recapitulate the same passage morphology as tribal puberty ceremonies. Joseph Campbell traces the monomythic hero journey as the internalized, mythologized form of passage ritual. More recently, Janusz and Walkiewicz have systematized the framework within developmental psychology, identifying liminality, deconstruction, and integration as the operative mechanisms of life-course transgression. The central tension throughout is between traditional societies — which institutionalized these passages — and modernity, which has allowed them to atrophy, producing what Hollis calls the wound of uninitiation.