Cremation occupies a rich and contested position within the depth-psychology corpus, functioning not merely as an archaeological datum but as a window onto archaic conceptions of the soul, the body, and the afterlife. Onians provides the most sustained theoretical treatment, arguing that cremation in Homer serves to expedite the ‘drying’ of the life-liquid housed in the body, thereby releasing the psyche to its proper domain — a reading that dissolves the apparent opposition between inhumation and burning by situating both within a single somatic cosmology. Rohde, approaching from the history of Greek religion, traces cremation’s prescriptive hold upon Homeric society and documents the accompanying practices — burning of possessions, the limb preserved for home burial — that reveal its embeddedness in a complex soul-economy. Burkert situates post-Mycenaean cremation within broader sacrificial and funerary anthropology, cataloguing its diffusion across Hittite, Hurrian, and Trojan cultures. Dodds introduces a productive complication: the persistence of object-offerings and feeding-tubes even in cremation burials suggests that the practice never wholly severed the ghost from its corporeal remainder, undermining Rohde’s thesis of a clean ontological separation. Vernant reads the shift from inhumation to cremation as a cultural marker of the post-Mycenaean rupture. Together, these voices establish cremation as a site where beliefs about desiccation, soul-release, purification, and communal identity converge and collide.