The Body Subject stands at a productive crossroads within the depth-psychology corpus, where phenomenological philosophy, Jungian analysis, somatic trauma theory, and cognitive neuroscience converge upon a single insistence: that the living body is not a passive object of consciousness but an active, meaning-generating subject in its own right. Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception furnishes the foundational architecture, articulating a prereflective bodily intentionality that precedes and conditions all reflective ego activity. Gallagher elaborates this into the operationally precise distinction between body schema — the body’s nonconscious, sub-intentional self-organization — and body image, the representational and affective relationship one bears toward one’s body. Woodman imports this insight directly into Jungian clinical practice, arguing that spontaneous bodily movement constellates the unconscious in precisely the same manner as dreaming, thereby making body workshop indispensable alongside dream analysis. Levine, working from trauma biology, names the body-unconscious explicitly, following D. H. Lawrence, as the locus where life itself announces its depth. Damasio provides the neurobiological scaffold: the proto-self is constituted through continuous somatic mapping, and feeling — as the body’s report on its own states — is the foundation of selfhood and rational deliberation. Neumann situates the body-subject developmentally, tracing how the nascent ego initially drowns in bodily process before progressively splitting from it, a split that yoga and depth analysis alike attempt to heal. Tension persists between those who ground the body-subject in prereflective phenomenal experience and those who locate its operations in sub-personal neural mechanisms — a tension that animates the most generative research in the field.