The term psyche-soma designates one of the most generative and contested dyads in the depth-psychological tradition, naming the question of how ensouled life and embodied life interpenetrate, diverge, or remain irreducibly one. The corpus approaches this question from several angles simultaneously. Ancient Greek scholarship — Bremmer, Snell, Onians, Dodds, Sullivan — traces the prehistory of the dyad, showing that the Homeric psyche was originally a life-breath or free-soul that departed the body at death, bearing no psychological content during life; the soma-psyche opposition as a philosophical problem emerges only gradually, crystallizing with Platonic and Aristotelian inquiry. Winnicott introduces the most clinically precise formulation within the object-relations tradition: under optimal maternal care, mind is fully integrated with psychosomatic experience; environmental failure produces a pathological ‘mind-psyche’ split in which mind usurps somatic experience. Kalsched imports this Winnicottian framework into Jungian trauma theory, linking psychosomatic dissociation to the self-care system. Murray Stein’s exposition of Jung situates the dyad cosmologically: the ego rests on both somatic and psychic bases, and psyche is neither reducible to body nor coterminous with it. Mizen’s neuropsychoanalytic contribution bridges contemporary neuroscience and depth psychology by examining disorders of body ownership and agency. The concordance as a whole reveals a field in which the ancient question — what is the relation of psyche to soma? — continues to animate clinical, developmental, and philosophical inquiry.