Embodied cognition names the claim that cognitive processes are not confined to neural computation in abstraction from the body but are constitutively shaped by the body’s morphology, sensorimotor capacities, and ongoing transactional engagement with the world. Within the depth-psychology corpus the term carries a wide theoretical arc. At one pole, Gallagher’s systematic phenomenological programme — indebted to Merleau-Ponty’s motor intentionality and to developmental neuroscience — argues that prenatal movement, the body schema, and proprioceptive feedback pre-structure perception, gesture, and intersubjective understanding before any representational cognition is possible. Merleau-Ponty himself anchors the lineage, insisting that movement is never mere thought-about-movement but a mode of being-toward-the-world whose intentionality is irreducibly motoric. Koch maps the clinical reach of embodiment research, cataloguing how posture, gesture, and movement feedback causally modulate affect and attitude formation, and pressing arts therapies to operationalise these findings. Barrett situates embodied cognition within predictive simulation, treating it as one label among several for the brain’s use of sensory and motor neurons to construct experience. Winhall and Fogel apply the framework clinically, contending that embodied awareness underlies integrated approaches to addiction and trauma. The key tension running across these voices concerns representation: whether embodied cognition ultimately requires internal representational models or whether, as Gallagher and Merleau-Ponty insist, the body’s prenoetic practical engagement with the world precedes and exceeds any representational account.