Union Of Opposites

In terms of psychological symbolism, it expresses the union of opposites—the union of the personal, temporal world of the ego with the non-personal, timeless world of the non-ego. Ultimately, this union is the fulfillment and goal of all religions: It is the union of the soul with God.

Jung defines the union of opposites as the supreme psychological and religious achievement, equating it with the soul’s unification with the divine and the integration of ego with the transpersonal Self.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Man and His Symbols, 1964thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

We are here informed that the Philosophers’ Stone is a union of two contrary entities, a hot, masculine, solar part and a cold feminine, lunar part. This corresponds to what Jung has demonstrated so comprehensively

Edinger reads the alchemical Philosophers’ Stone as a precise symbolic encoding of the union of opposites, connecting the solar-masculine and lunar-feminine poles to Jung’s comprehensive psychological demonstration of the same principle.

Edinger, Edward F., Ego and Archetype: Individuation and the Religious Function of the Psyche, 1972thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the bottom of the cistern in our dream is characterized by a complete union of opposites. This is the primordial condition of things, and at the same time a most ideal achievement, because it is the union of elements eternally opposed.

Jung identifies the union of opposites as simultaneously the original ground of being and the highest psychological achievement, linking it to the Chinese concept of Tao as complete harmony of heaven and earth.

Jung, C.G., Collected Works Volume 18: The Symbolic Life, 1976thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The black or unconscious state that resulted from the union of opposites reaches the nadir and a change sets in … The preceding union of opposites has brought light, as always, out of the darkness of night, and by this light it will be possible to see what the real meaning of that union was.

Jung describes the alchemical nigredo-to-albedo sequence as the direct consequence of the union of opposites, demonstrating that psychic illumination emerges necessarily from the darkness produced by that very union.

Jung, C.G., Collected Works Volume 16: The Practice of Psychotherapy, 1954thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Opposites genuinely coincide while remaining opposites … opposites not only co-exist, but give rise to and fulfil one another (‘sunt complementa’), and are conjoined (like the poles of a magnet) without any intervening boundary, while nonetheless remaining distinct as opposites.

McGilchrist argues philosophically that genuine union of opposites requires neither dissolution into monism nor mere juxtaposition, but a dynamic coinherence in which differentiation intensifies through intimacy.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Opposites genuinely coincide while remaining opposites … opposites not only co-exist, but give rise to and fulfil one another (‘sunt complementa’), and are conjoined (like the poles of a magnet) without any intervening boundary, while nonetheless remaining distinct as opposites.

McGilchrist argues philosophically that genuine union of opposites requires neither dissolution into monism nor mere juxtaposition, but a dynamic coinherence in which differentiation intensifies through intimacy.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

All things arise from opposing, but in some form nonetheless related, drives or forces. Energy is always characterised by the coming together of apparent opposites – apparent because this is how we have conceived things left hemisphere fashion

McGilchrist grounds the generative power of opposites in both mythological and physical reality, arguing that what the left hemisphere perceives as genuine opposition is actually the dynamic structure of energy itself.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

All things arise from opposing, but in some form nonetheless related, drives or forces. Energy is always characterised by the coming together of apparent opposites – apparent because this is how we have conceived things left hemisphere fashion

McGilchrist grounds the generative power of opposites in both mythological and physical reality, arguing that what the left hemisphere perceives as genuine opposition is actually the dynamic structure of energy itself.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

You stress the principle of the opposites and the importance of their union. You also write of enantiodromia in relation to the opposites but this (in the sense in which Heraclitus used the term) would n

Jung explicitly affirms the principle of opposites and their union as central to his thought, connecting it to the Heraclitean concept of enantiodromia and thus to the ancient philosophical pedigree of the idea.

Jung, C.G., Collected Works Volume 18: The Symbolic Life, 1976supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

if the opposing forces in lyre or bow simply annulled one another, the string would go slack – no ‘tonus’ – and nothing, no flight of notes, no arrow’s flight – could come from either. This is also, by the way, what is intended by the Golden Mean: not a flabby compromise, but a position in which taut synergy produces a dynamic equipoise.

McGilchrist uses Heraclitean imagery of the lyre and bow to argue that productive union of opposites is a living, tensile harmony rather than a deadening compromise.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

if the opposing forces in lyre or bow simply annulled one another, the string would go slack – no ‘tonus’ – and nothing, no flight of notes, no arrow’s flight – could come from either. This is also, by the way, what is intended by the Golden Mean: not a flabby compromise, but a position in which taut synergy produces a dynamic equipoise.

McGilchrist uses Heraclitean imagery of the lyre and bow to argue that productive union of opposites is a living, tensile harmony rather than a deadening compromise.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

It is as if the opposites of the world, whose contradictoriness and conflict make all our difficulties and troubles, were melted into unity. Not only do they, as contrasted species, belong to one and the same genus, but one of the species, the nobler and better one, is itself the genus

William James, cited by McGilchrist, describes mystical experience as the melting of opposites into unity, where one pole—the nobler—subsumes and reconciles the tension without eliminating it.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

It is as if the opposites of the world, whose contradictoriness and conflict make all our difficulties and troubles, were melted into unity. Not only do they, as contrasted species, belong to one and the same genus, but one of the species, the nobler and better one, is itself the genus

William James, cited by McGilchrist, describes mystical experience as the melting of opposites into unity, where one pole—the nobler—subsumes and reconciles the tension without eliminating it.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the Rex marinus … has a kingdom under the sea … nothing prospers and nothing is begotten; there are no births because only like mates with like. For things to be born, opposites have to unite—like needs to mate with unlike.

Edinger reads the alchemical Vision of Arisleus as a mythic statement that procreation and psychic generation are impossible without the mating of opposites, making the union of opposites a prerequisite for all new psychological life.

Edinger, Edward F., The Mysterium Lectures: A Journey Through C.G. Jung’s Mysterium Coniunctionis, 1995supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Jung conceived of the structure of being as consisting of a great network of interrelated syzygies, or dual powers … the manifested worlds of mind, feeling, intuition and materiality come into existence by polarization, or separation into pairs of opposites of an original wholeness.

Hoeller aligns Jung’s structural psychology with Gnostic and Taoist systems in which the union of opposites is not merely psychological but the fundamental ontological mechanism by which all manifest existence proceeds from primordial wholeness.

Hoeller, Stephan A., The Gnostic Jung and the Seven Sermons to the Dead, 1982supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

In Jung’s Sermons the Syzygies are called pairs of opposites and some of them are enumerated in the text. Among these are: effective and ineffective; fullness and emptiness; living and dead; difference and sameness; light and dark; hot and cold

Hoeller catalogs the Gnostic syzygies in Jung’s Seven Sermons to the Dead as an exhaustive enumeration of the paired opposites whose tension and potential union constitute the Pleroma’s dynamic structure.

Hoeller, Stephan A., The Gnostic Jung and the Seven Sermons to the Dead, 1982supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

opposites require to be satisfied together: no single goal can be successfully pursued without due acknowledgment, and indeed acceptance of, its contrary … Somehow life does, out of its total resources, find ways of satisfying opposites at once.

McGilchrist, drawing on James, argues that ethical and religious life demonstrate the practical necessity of satisfying opposites simultaneously, confirming that the union of opposites is not merely theoretical but constitutive of mature living.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

opposites require to be satisfied together: no single goal can be successfully pursued without due acknowledgment, and indeed acceptance of, its contrary … Somehow life does, out of its total resources, find ways of satisfying opposites at once.

McGilchrist, drawing on James, argues that ethical and religious life demonstrate the practical necessity of satisfying opposites simultaneously, confirming that the union of opposites is not merely theoretical but constitutive of mature living.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

now we come to the consummation of the hierosgamos, the ‘earthing’ of the spirit and the spiritualizing of the earth, the Jungian of opposites and reconciliation of the divided … the longed-for act of redemption whereby the sinfulness of existence, the original dissociation, will be annulled in God.

Jung frames the alchemical hierosgamos as the moment of spirit’s earthing and earth’s spiritualization, reading the union of opposites as a redemptive act that heals the original dissociation at the root of existence.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Mysterium Coniunctionis: An Inquiry into the Separation and Synthesis of Psychic Opposites in Alchemy, 1955supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

This continual process of getting to know the counterposition in the unconscious I have called the ‘transcendent function,’ because the confrontation of conscious (rational) data with those that are unconscious (irrati

Jung names the ongoing confrontation with the unconscious opposite the transcendent function, establishing it as the dynamic psychological mechanism by which the union of opposites is approached in clinical practice.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Mysterium Coniunctionis: An Inquiry into the Separation and Synthesis of Psychic Opposites in Alchemy, 1955supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

it suggests not only a power that unifies, but one that specifically synthesises opposites … This power … reveals itself in the balance or reconciliation of opposite or discordant qualities: of sameness, with diffe

McGilchrist reads Coleridge’s esemplastic imagination as the creative faculty that achieves the synthesis of opposites, connecting aesthetic theory directly to the psychological and ontological principle of reconciliation.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

it suggests not only a power that unifies, but one that specifically synthesises opposites … This power … reveals itself in the balance or reconciliation of opposite or discordant qualities: of sameness, with diffe

McGilchrist reads Coleridge’s esemplastic imagination as the creative faculty that achieves the synthesis of opposites, connecting aesthetic theory directly to the psychological and ontological principle of reconciliation.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Anaximander yields a number of insights: into the necessary, both productive and destructive, nature of the coming together of opposites; into the primacy of what is neither definite nor finite

McGilchrist traces the philosophical roots of the union of opposites to Anaximander and Heraclitus, situating the principle within the pre-Socratic right-hemisphere apprehension of reality as process rather than thing.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World, 2009supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Oppositionalism soon runs away with Jungian practitioners … There is always something to add. If we could examine what goes on in the practitioner’s mind in terms of Jung’s four kinds of oppositions, I believe we would find something like this.

Hillman critically examines the clinical over-application of compensatory opposition in Jungian practice, warning that mechanical use of the union of opposites as a therapeutic formula distorts rather than serves the individuation process.

Hillman, James, The Dream and the Underworld, 1979aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

separatio must precede coniunctio … Purify husband and wife separately, in order that they may unite more intimately; for if you do not purify them, they cannot love each other.

Edinger emphasizes that the alchemical tradition insists on prior separation and purification as a necessary precondition for genuine coniunctio, implying that the union of opposites is only possible after the differentiation of what is to be united.

Edinger, Edward F., Anatomy of the Psyche: Alchemical Symbolism in Psychotherapy, 1985aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

‘das Nichts selbst nichtet’ … Nothing, like Being, is no thing … it is a subject of action, Heidegger implies (it positively ‘noths’). There is nothing to which

McGilchrist invokes Heidegger’s paradox of the Nothingness that actively ‘noths’ as an example of the generative tension of opposites operating at the level of ontology itself.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

‘das Nichts selbst nichtet’ … Nothing, like Being, is no thing … it is a subject of action, Heidegger implies (it positively ‘noths’). There is nothing to which

McGilchrist invokes Heidegger’s paradox of the Nothingness that actively ‘noths’ as an example of the generative tension of opposites operating at the level of ontology itself.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →