The coniunctio stands as one of the most architecturally central terms in the depth-psychological corpus, functioning simultaneously as alchemical metaphor, psychological telos, and archetypal event. Jung’s magnum opus on the subject, *Mysterium Coniunctionis* (1955), establishes the term as the culminating symbol of the alchemical opus — the synthesis of psychic opposites whose separation and reunification constitute the very grammar of individuation. For Jung, the coniunctio is an a priori image embedded in Western religious and esoteric tradition, drawing on the hieros gamos, the Christian sponsus-sponsa mysticism, and Hermetic philosophy alike; it expresses an archetype that alchemy projected onto matter but which psychology reclaims as inner event. Edinger’s systematic exegesis in *Anatomy of the Psyche* and *The Mysterium Lectures* distinguishes a lesser coniunctio — the fusion of imperfectly differentiated opposites, typically productive of further mortification — from the greater coniunctio, an encounter with transpersonal wholeness that eludes rational category. Von Franz accents the relational and mystical register: coniunctio as unio mystica with the Self, as the inner meaning of serious love, as the alchemical mystery consummated in the closed vessel of analytical discretion. A recurring tension in the corpus concerns literalization: Edinger and Jung both warn that the coniunctio archetype, when constellated in the transference, threatens enactment, and must instead be held symbolically. The term thus occupies the intersection of alchemy, individuation theory, transference dynamics, and eschatological speculation.