The term ‘Transcendent Affect’ occupies an uneasy but productive boundary in the depth-psychology corpus, spanning Jungian analytic theory, transpersonal psychology, and contemporary affective science. Within the Jungian lineage, affect that transcends the ordinary ego register is theorized primarily through the concept of the transcendent function — the dynamic process by which the tension of opposites generates a living symbol and effects genuine psychic transformation. Here, transcendence is not a metaphysical predicate but a functional description of movement between psychological states, with affect serving as both raw material and catalyst. In the transpersonal current — represented by Grof, Yaden, and allied researchers — the term indexes a cluster of self-transcendent positive emotions (awe, elevation, love, compassion) and peak or mystical experiences characterized by reduced self-salience and heightened felt connectedness. Keltner and Haidt’s work on awe grounds this affective quality empirically, documenting prosocial, health-promoting, and consciousness-altering sequelae. Campbell and Aurobindo approach transcendent affect from mythological and integral-yogic frameworks, describing the energetic overflow of a transpersonal life-force into individual experience. Key tensions concern whether transcendent affect is best understood as a functional psychological mechanism, a neurobiologically measurable state, or an encounter with genuinely supra-personal dimensions of being. The stakes are clinical, philosophical, and cultural: how depth psychology handles affect that exceeds the ego’s organizing capacity determines its approach to individuation, the numinous, and the healing potential of extraordinary states.