Within the depth-psychology and allied traditions, mystical experience occupies a contested but indispensable position. William James, whose four-part taxonomy — ineffability, noetic quality, transiency, and passivity — remains the dominant phenomenological scaffold, treats mystical states as among the most evidentially significant data points for any serious psychology of religion. Jung inherits and extends this framework, integrating Rudolf Otto’s concept of the numinous and insisting that mystical experience, far from being pathology, represents a critical encounter with unconscious forces that can occasion genuine psychic transformation; his warning that modern rationalism systematically misreads such states as mere irrationalism is pointed and persistent. A persistent tension runs through the corpus between perennialist readings — Huxley, Huston Smith, Stace — which hold that interpretations may vary while the experiences themselves share a universal core, and constructivist or culturally situated approaches that emphasize the degree to which concepts of self and society shape the phenomenology. The psychopharmacological turn, represented by Griffiths, Strassman, and Grof, adds an empirical register: psilocybin and DMT can occasion states meeting the classic Jamesian criteria, raising questions about the relationship between neurochemistry and genuine spiritual transformation. Eliade, Corbin, and Campbell further complicate the picture by situating mystical experience within comparative religion, Islamic theosophy, and mythological symbolism respectively, emphasizing its cross-cultural ubiquity and its relationship to self-transcendence and the dissolution of ordinary ego-boundaries.