The concept of therapeutic narrative occupies a generative and contested space within the depth-psychology corpus. At its most fundamental, the term designates the recognition that storytelling is not merely preparatory to therapeutic work but constitutes its very substance — a position articulated with particular force by Neimeyer’s constructivist framework, wherein ‘humans think, perceive, imagine, and make moral choices according to narrative structures.’ Hillman presses this recognition further, insisting that case histories are themselves fictions in a philosophically rigorous sense, and that therapy produces a distinctively literary genre — the ‘therapeutic fiction’ — in which therapist and patient collaborate as co-authors of a mutual story. These two positions establish the central tension in the corpus: whether narrative is primarily a cognitive-constructivist tool for meaning reconstruction, or an imaginative, poetic event with its own autonomous authority. Siegel extends the framework neurobiologically, arguing that narrative co-construction is mediated by the brain’s social circuitry and serves the acquisition of adaptive self-organization. Trauma theorists — Ogden, Lanius, Courtois — introduce a complicating counterpoint: somatic and dissociative processes frequently interrupt or distort narrative coherence, requiring clinicians to regulate arousal before narrative processing can occur. The therapeutic narrative thus emerges not as a transparent vehicle for truth but as a crafted, embodied, and always co-constructed act whose healing power is inseparable from its fictional, relational, and neurobiological dimensions.