The figure of the Stranger occupies a structurally and ethically charged position across the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as social category, symbolic threshold, and epistemic problem. In the Homeric materials — the primary locus of the term’s elaboration — the Stranger (xenos) is never merely a sociological designation; rather, the willingness to receive strangers indexes moral order itself. Homer’s Odyssey frames the question starkly: communities are either ‘lawless aggressors’ or peoples who welcome strangers, as if hospitality toward the unknown other were a civilizational coefficient. The disguised Odysseus, received or rejected as a wandering beggar, enacts this polarity with dramatic density, exposing how recognition and misrecognition structure the entire homecoming narrative. Nagy’s philological commentary extends the problem: the stranger’s ambiguous status as seer, craftsman, or poet makes the Stranger a figure of concealed power and unverified identity. Plato’s Sophist introduces a distinct register: ‘the Stranger’ appears as a philosophical interlocutor whose dialectical method forces a reckoning with being, not-being, and false appearance — the Stranger as epistemological irritant. Across these registers the Stranger condenses tensions between hospitality and violence, concealment and revelation, legitimate authority and imposture.