The figure of the Beggar occupies a peculiarly charged position in the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as social outcast, spiritual archetype, psychological symbol, and ethical provocation. Nietzsche’s ‘voluntary beggar’ in Zarathustra crystallises one pole: the individual who renounces riches not from necessity but as a willed act of kenosis, only to discover that giving well is ‘harder than to take well’ — a paradox with direct resonance in Jungian individuation theory. Jung himself, reading Nietzsche in his seminar, extends the beggar into an Eastern wisdom frame: the king, the beggar, and the criminal are roles assigned by fate, and consciousness consists in recognising one’s situation as a role rather than an essence. Von Franz, working through fairy-tale psychology, identifies the animus-as-beggar as a specifically feminine psychological snare: the unconscious presents itself as impoverished, inducing in the woman a corresponding inner poverty. Homer’s Odyssey provides the classical substrate — Odysseus disguised as a beggar becomes a locus for examining aidos (shame-honour), generosity, and the socially liminal — a thread pursued in detail by Cairns and Nagy. The Reformation context (Fromm) adds a socio-historical dimension: begging orders became morally suspect precisely as the efficiency ethic rose, marking the beggar as a site of cultural anxiety about productivity and worth.