Disguise in the depth-psychological corpus is not a simple concealment but a complex, often generative phenomenon situated at the intersection of identity, the daemon, the persona, and the unconscious. Hillman provides the most sustained analysis, devoting an entire chapter of *The Soul’s Code* to disguise as a biographical and daimonic category: the renaming, fictionalizing, and self-invention practiced by figures such as Stokowski, Simenon, and Duncan are read not as mere deception but as the soul’s protective covering of its deeper image. In Jungian symbology, the cave-painting shamans in animal disguise (Jung, *Man and His Symbols*) suggest that disguise has archaic ritual functions — the human merged with the animal becomes a liminal conduit. Greene identifies Saturn’s penchant for disguise in mythological transformation, linking the archetypal principle of concealment to survival and initiation. Campbell reads the removal of disguise as a moment of dangerous exposure in alchemical and courtly love mythology. Homer’s Odysseus offers the literary archetype: the hero whose disguise as beggar is the condition for both survival and recognition. The Freudian tradition, by contrast, treats persons in dreams as disguises for other persons — substitutions within an interpretive economy. Across these positions, a central tension persists: whether disguise is primarily evasion of truth or, paradoxically, the protective shell within which authentic selfhood ripens toward disclosure.