Somatic cognition — the proposition that the body itself, and the heart in particular, constitutes a genuine organ of knowing — occupies a contested but generative position across the depth-psychology corpus. Hillman’s sustained meditation in ‘The Thought of the Heart’ provides the theoretical anchor: drawing on Paracelsus, Corbin, and alchemical psychology, he argues that the heart perceives, imagines, and responds to the world through aisthesis — an animal, aesthetic intelligence irreducible to cerebrally mediated reason. This is not metaphor but ontological claim. Sardello seconds the position, asserting the heart’s autonomous intelligence against the brain’s monopoly on cognition, while Moore’s synoptic reading locates the same faculty across the body’s many organs, each generating its own imaginal field. Ancient warrant is furnished by Onians and Caswell, who trace the cognitive functions of thumos and the phrenes in early Greek epic, demonstrating that heart-centred knowing predates the Cartesian split Damasio later anatomises as error. Damasio’s somatic marker hypothesis offers the neurobiological bridge, reframing visceral states as indispensable contributors to practical reasoning. Ogden and Payne, writing from clinical sensorimotor and somatic-experiencing traditions, translate these theoretical commitments into therapeutic method. The central tension in the corpus runs between the archetypal-imaginative reading (Hillman, Sardello) and the neuroscientific-clinical reading (Damasio, Ogden), with the Greek and Egyptian philological record serving both camps as shared, if differently interpreted, ground.