Sickness in the depth-psychology corpus is never merely a biomedical event; it is a site of ontological and symbolic density. The passages assembled here reveal at least four distinct theoretical orientations. First, the Stoic tradition, represented by Long and Sedley’s compilation, provides a rigorous taxonomy distinguishing soul-sickness as hardened appetitive opinion from mere proneness-to-passion — a differentiation that anticipates later psychodynamic models of character pathology. Second, Hillman’s archetypal psychology radically refuses to quarantine sickness within a single ‘morbid archetype,’ arguing instead that pathologizing is intrinsic to every archetypal configuration, each god carrying its own infirmitas. Third, a phenomenological strand — Moore, Frank, Sardello — treats illness as a carrier of meaning: Moore reads disease etymologically as the loss of ease and erotic pleasure; Frank analyses sickness narratives as culturally conditioned plots; Sardello hears disease as a message from the soul of the world. Fourth, ancient and anthropological voices (Padel on Greek medical cosmology, Eliade on shamanic election through illness) situate sickness within cosmological and initiatory frameworks. The animating tension across all positions concerns agency and meaning: Is sickness punishment, escape valve, archetypal necessity, cultural symptom, or initiatory ordeal? The corpus refuses any single answer, insisting that reductive medicalization forecloses dimensions the psyche requires.