Woundedness, as it traverses the depth-psychological corpus, is never merely a pathological condition to be remedied but a structural and even constitutive feature of psychic life. The literature divides, broadly, into three streams. The first, most elaborately developed by Hillman in his analyses of the puer aeternus, treats woundedness as an archetypal disclosure: the wound reveals essence, marks vulnerability as destiny, and—when the scar rather than the open wound is achieved—becomes the basis for a differentiated, self-contained consciousness. The motif of the wounded healer, running from Chiron and Asklepios through Christ to the modern analyst, supplies a second major strand: Sedgwick and von Franz both insist that the therapist’s own unhealed wound is not incidental but is the very engine of therapeutic capacity. A third stream, represented by Hollis, Estés, and Frank, situates woundedness within gendered and somatic experience—the necessary wounding of initiation, the wound a man must face within himself rather than project onto women, the wound that, in illness narrative, becomes the condition of witness and ethical responsibility. Across all three streams a tension persists between woundedness as gift or vocation and woundedness as a defended-against truth that, when denied, produces spiritual bypassing, paranoid closure, or the perpetuation of unconsciousness.