Orientation
Across the depth-psychology corpus, the body occupies no single ontological address but instead serves as a contested site where biology, phenomenology, psyche, and culture converge. Damasio grounds the body as the primary epistemic medium through which the brain constructs both world-maps and self: neurons are, in his formulation, constitutively ‘about’ the body, and body-mapping is the foundation of consciousness itself. Gallagher distinguishes rigorously between body schema — the pre-noetic, non-conscious postural and motor organization — and body image, the affectively charged, consciously accessible representation, a distinction with direct clinical consequence. Levine positions the body as the primary theater of trauma resolution: what cannot be spoken is nevertheless registered somatically, and healing requires the re-inhabitation of bodily sensation. Ogden extends this into therapeutic method, treating the body’s procedural habits as the stored text of relational history. Estés and Moore bring a mythopoetic register, insisting that the body is soul-bearer, sensor, and holy teacher — not mere instrument. Masters diagnoses spiritual bypassing partly as a failure of somatic integration. Thompson, engaging the phenomenological tradition, reframes mind-body dualism as a ‘body-body problem,’ collapsing the Cartesian gap into the question of lived embodiment. Hillman reads the body through fantasy and flesh. The Platonic and Stoic legacies — body as vessel, body as the only locus of causal power — form the historical poles around which modern depth-psychological positions orbit.