The shoe occupies a surprisingly rich position within the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as symbol, cultural artifact, and index of the psyche’s engagement with embodiment, boundary, and vocation. Von Franz provides the most systematic analytic treatment, reading the shoe as clothing specific to the foot and therefore as an attitude toward the foundational, earth-contacting aspect of existence; she registers the longstanding symbolic identification of the foot with phallic energy and, consequently, the shoe with the feminine vessel that receives it. Huang’s I Ching commentary extends this symbolism into a Chinese philosophical register, where the shoe-as-履 (lü) encodes the act of treading upon one’s proper path—fulfilling duty and walking one’s agreement with life. Epictetus introduces a Stoic corrective: the shoe should be measured strictly by the foot, its natural standard; to exceed that measure is to begin an infinite regress of vanity. Vaughan-Lee and Onians illuminate the shoe’s ritual and initiatory dimensions: the pebble placed in the shoe as ascetic spiritual discipline, and the shoe’s role in betrothal, fertility, and mortuary rites. Jung’s shipboard hallucination in Memories, Dreams, Reflections demonstrates how shoes animated by the unconscious become autonomous objects—precursors to active imagination. Beebe’s meditation on the shoeshine man as vocational individuation rounds out the range, placing the crafting and tending of shoes squarely within the individuation process.