Within the depth-psychology and neuropsychological corpus, ‘right side’ operates on two distinct but interpenetrating registers: the neuroanatomical and the symbolic-archetypal. On the neuroanatomical plane, the right side of the brain — and, by extension, the right hemisphere as a functional whole — emerges across multiple authoritative voices as the primary locus of holistic, contextual, and affective processing: the domain of sustained attention, social attunement, emotional regulation, and the apprehension of novelty (McGilchrist, van der Kolk, Porges, Siegel, Craig). The right hemisphere’s dominance in autonomic regulation, its recruitment during traumatic flashback, its role in detecting gestalt patterns, and its susceptibility to hemineglect when damaged all receive sustained treatment. Porges and Craig document how the right side of the brain maintains asymmetric control over autonomic and interoceptive functions, while van der Kolk observes that trauma activates specifically the right hemisphere. On the symbolic register, Jung and von Franz situate the right side within a cosmological and alchemical grammar, where it corresponds to the solar, masculine, conscious, and ordered pole of experience — the realm of Mercury and divine reason — standing in structured opposition to the lunar left. Jodorowsky, working from the tarot tradition, maps right and left onto mirror-image liturgical architectures. The tension between these two registers — one empirical-neurological, one mythopoeic — constitutes the productive ambiguity of this term throughout the library.