Returning occupies a structurally foundational position across the depth-psychology corpus, appearing not as simple repetition but as the dynamic ground of renewal, restoration, and cyclical selfhood. The I Ching tradition, represented by Liu I-ming, Ritsema and Karcher, Huang, and Cleary, treats Returning (Hexagram 24, Fu) as the pivotal cosmological moment when yang re-emerges from yin exhaustion — a movement that must be neither forced nor missed, but recognized and gathered at the precise instant of its appearance. Here Returning is ontological: the recovery of primordial nature from its occlusion by acquired conditioning. Clarissa Pinkola Estés translates this cosmological rhythm into depth-psychological terms, theorizing Returning as the indispensable feminine cycle of soul-replenishment — the periodic retreat to soul-home that restores instinctual vitality depleted by life in the outer world. For Estés, this cycle is not optional but constitutive of psychic health, as reflexive to women’s nature as respiration. James Hillman introduces the dimension of temporal longing, connecting Returning to the mythic archetype of Eternal Return: figures from the personal past reappear in old age not as mere nostalgia but as psyche’s insistence on unfinished essences. These three positions — cosmological, instinctual-ecological, and archetypal-temporal — form the major axes of the corpus. The operative tension runs between Returning as disciplined receptivity (one must prepare and wait) and Returning as urgent necessity (delay is pathology).