Yang, as the active, creative, masculine principle of Chinese cosmology, occupies a structural position of primary importance throughout the depth-psychology corpus’s engagement with the I Ching and Taoist thought. The literature does not treat Yang as a mere opposite to Yin but as a dynamic, relational force whose significance emerges precisely through its dialectical tension with its complement. From von Franz’s identification of Yang with time, spirit, and the invisible creative field—contrasted with Yin’s governance of space and matter—to Liu I-ming’s alchemical reading of Yang as ‘true yang,’ the sane primal energy that underlies Confucian singleness of mind, Taoist embracing of the One, and Buddhist return to the One, the corpus consistently elevates Yang beyond simple gender symbolism. The Taoist I Ching tradition, as transmitted through Cleary and Liu I-ming, treats the cultivation and preservation of Yang as the central practical problem of inner alchemy: Yang must be nurtured, timed, and strategically withdrawn to prevent its culmination into inevitable reversal toward Yin. Wang Bi’s classical commentary preserves the structural logic of Yang lines within hexagram architecture, while Hellmut Wilhelm traces Yang’s symbolic prehistory through dragon, stallion, and cosmic polarity. Alfred Huang establishes the numerical code—nine as Greater Yang, seven as Lesser Yang—grounding the principle in divinatory mechanics. The critical tension across these voices is between Yang as cosmological given and Yang as cultivated achievement.