Across the depth-psychology corpus, ‘cycle’ functions not as a merely descriptive temporal term but as a foundational ontological category through which psyche, cosmos, and biography are understood as structured wholes. Rudhyar provides the most systematic treatment, distinguishing the sidereal day, the solar year, and the Great Polar Cycle as nested orders of experience corresponding to individual, collective, and planetary selfhood — with ‘cyclology’ proposed as the discipline proper to living time, parallel to mathematics for abstract space. Von Franz traces the irreversible-linear versus cyclical duality in primordial conceptions of time, grounding the cyclical in astronomical observation and in India’s mahayuga doctrine. Tarnas applies planetary cycle analysis to biographical and historical creativity, demonstrating that Uranus transits correlate with signature intellectual breakthroughs. Vernant reads Hesiod’s races as a complete cycle implying renewal through destruction. The Tarot literature — Jodorowsky, Nichols, Pollack — treats the Wheel of Fortune as the archetype of cyclic alternation, linking ascent and descent, fortune and ruin, to the soul’s orientation toward transformation. A distinct clinical register appears in contemporary neuroscience and psychiatry, where the menstrual cycle frames hormonal fluctuations that modulate executive function and ADHD symptomatology in women. The central tension across these registers is between cycle as eternal return (mythic, cosmic) and cycle as developmental spiral in which each return is qualitatively transformed.