Across the depth-psychology corpus, the psychopathological symptom occupies a position far more complex than mere clinical sign or diagnostic marker. Freud’s foundational premise—that insight derives from the alien, the abnormal, the suffering—established pathological manifestation as the privileged entry point into psychic reality, a conviction Hillman radicalizes into the claim that pathologizing is intrinsic to soul-life itself, not an aberration to be dismantled. Hillman’s archetypal psychology insists that the symptom must be comprehended psychologically rather than treated clinically, arguing that the two orientations are mutually exclusive. Jung’s early experimental work, particularly on hysterical symptoms and the association experiment, frames the symptom as an expression of autonomous complexes whose repression mechanisms mirror those operative in dreams. Bleuler, working from a clinical-phenomenological standpoint, distinguishes primary from secondary symptoms in schizophrenia, demonstrating how psychic content elaborates upon an organic predisposition. Grof maps symptom constellations onto perinatal matrices, situating them within transpersonal and somatic registers. The tension running through the entire corpus is between the hermeneutic imperative—the symptom as meaningful communication from the psyche’s depths—and the biomedical imperative to treat, remediate, and dissolve. This tension makes the psychopathological symptom one of depth psychology’s most generative and contested concepts.