The Association Experiment occupies a foundational position in the depth-psychological corpus, functioning simultaneously as empirical method, diagnostic instrument, and theoretical proving ground. Its genealogy runs through Wundt’s experimental psychology at Leipzig, where the stimulus-word/reaction-word paradigm was first systematized, but its decisive transformation occurs in Jung’s Burghölzli researches of 1904–1910, where measurable disturbances in reaction-time, reproduction, and galvanic response become windows onto affectively charged unconscious formations — the complexes. For Jung, the experiment is not a neutral test of associative mechanics but a conversation between experimenter and subject in which each stimulus-word conjures the situation it names, thereby eliciting the subject’s entire psychological past. Freud acknowledged the experiment’s importance for psychoanalysis, noting that it demonstrated how free associations are governed by unconscious complexes rather than chance. The methodological tension the corpus registers is between those who would confine the experiment to quantitative psychophysics and those — Jung foremost among them — who insist that its true yield is qualitative: the revelation of autonomous, feeling-toned complexes underlying hysteria, dementia praecox, epilepsy, and criminal concealment alike. The experiment thus bridges experimental psychiatry, forensic psychology, and the nascent science of the unconscious.