The pairs of opposites constitute one of the most architecturally central concepts in the depth-psychological corpus, functioning simultaneously as cosmological principle, energic postulate, and clinical diagnostic. Its locus classicus is Jung's Septem Sermones ad Mortuos, where the Pleroma's qualities are enumerated as irreducible dyads — light and dark, good and evil, time and space — that cancel one another in the undifferentiated ground yet become operative, even tyrannical, once differentiated within the creaturely psyche. This ontological framing is developed across Jung's mature writings into an energic theory: libido requires the tension of opposites for its very movement, and civilizational dissociation is understood as the progressive widening of the polar gap, purchasing psychic power at the cost of one-sidedness. The Gnostic tradition, as Hoeller demonstrates, supplies the syzygy as a parallel structure. Edinger, reading both alchemy and the Sermons, situates the pairs within the separatio process foundational to individuation. Campbell and the Tantric traditions extend the theme cosmogonically — the drop striking the field of time breaks into opposites, while the mystic's aim is the transcendence of that very field. McGilchrist, approaching from neuroscience and philosophy, argues for the generative, not merely reconciliatory, power of opposing forces. The central tension across the corpus is whether the opposites are to be synthesized, transcended, held in creative tension, or accepted as the constitutive structure of psychic existence itself.
In the library
21 passages
The qualities are PAIRS OF OPPOSITES, such as— The Effective and the Ineffective. Fullness and Emptiness. Living and Dead... The pairs of opposites are qualities of the pleroma which are not, because each balanceth each.
Jung's Sermones establishes the pairs of opposites as the constitutive qualities of the Pleroma that, though self-cancelling in the undifferentiated ground, become actively operative and dangerous once differentiated within creaturely existence.
Jung, Carl Gustav, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, 1963thesis
Its qualities are the PAIRS OF OPPOSITES... we ourselves are the Pleroma, we also have these qualities present within us... It is thus that we are the victims of the pairs of opposites. For in us the Pleroma is rent in two.
The First Sermon identifies the pairs of opposites as Pleromatic qualities that become a source of human suffering precisely because creaturely differentiation splits what the undifferentiated ground holds in mutual cancellation.
Hoeller, Stephan A., The Gnostic Jung and the Seven Sermons to the Dead, 1982thesis
We must, therefore, distinguish the qualities of the pleroma. The qualities are PAIRS OF OPPOSITES... The pairs of opposites are qualities of the pleroma which are not, because each balanceth each.
Edinger's commentary on the Sermones foregrounds the pairs of opposites as the necessary object of psychological discrimination, linking them directly to the principium individuationis.
Edinger, Edward F., Anatomy of the Psyche: Alchemical Symbolism in Psychotherapy, 1985thesis
The libido as an energetic phenomenon contains the pairs of opposites, otherwise there would be no movement of the libido... because of our dissociation, the pairs of opposites are much further apart. This gives us our increased psychical energy, and the price we pay is one-sidedness.
Jung argues that the pairs of opposites are the structural precondition of libidinal movement, and that civilizational dissociation widens the polar distance, amplifying psychic energy at the cost of increasing one-sidedness.
Jung, C.G., Analytical Psychology: Notes of the Seminar Given in 1925, 1989thesis
Binaries, or Syzygies as they are more often called, are a time-honored feature of Gnosticism... In Jung's Sermons the Syzygies are called pairs of opposites and some of them are enumerated in the text.
Hoeller situates Jung's pairs of opposites within the Gnostic tradition of syzygies, demonstrating that the Sermones consciously adopts a cosmological binary structure rooted in emanationist thought.
Hoeller, Stephan A., The Gnostic Jung and the Seven Sermons to the Dead, 1982thesis
Since the earliest times, then, the pairs of opposites have been the theme of men's thoughts. The next important philosopher we have to consider in connection with them is Heraclitus. He is singularly Chinese in his philosophy and is the only Western man who has ever really compassed the East.
Jung traces the philosophical lineage of the pairs of opposites from ancient Chinese thought through Heraclitus, establishing the concept's cross-cultural and pan-historical status as a primary category of human reflection.
Jung, C.G., Analytical Psychology: Notes of the Seminar Given in 1925, 1989supporting
the image you adopt has to symbolize the suitable fusion of the pairs of opposites in a way that makes it possible for you to function in a civilized society without shutting out the primitive.
Jung's 1923 correspondence, cited by Peterson, defines the therapeutic goal as the symbolic fusion of the pairs of opposites, allowing civilized functioning without suppression of primitive energies.
Peterson, Cody, The Shadow of a Figure of Light, 2024supporting
those are simply the pairs of opposites as in any manifestation of energy... the pairs of opposites in the spirit, the great conflict, is such a hot problem because here the question arises: what are these opposites?
Jung reads Nietzsche's hammer-and-anvil imagery as a manifestation of the universal law that energy requires the pairs of opposites, while acknowledging the particular intensity and danger of confronting the opposites within the spiritual realm.
Jung, C.G., Nietzsche's Zarathustra: Notes of the Seminar Given in 1934-1939, 1988supporting
Jung did conceive of psychological process in terms of discrimination and then synthesis of opposites. The experience of synthesising the opposites involves a process of balancing or self-regulation. Jung refers to this as compensation.
Samuels critically examines Jung's opposites schema, mapping it onto Hegelian dialectics and demonstrating how synthesis, compensation, and self-regulation are the clinical corollaries of the theoretical structure.
Samuels, Andrew, Jung and the Post-Jungians, 1985supporting
the drop striking the field of time, breaking into the pairs of opposites: Cakra 3, aggression, Cakra 2, erotics, male and female, pairs of opposites in all the aspects... We're beyond pairs of opposites.
Campbell maps the pairs of opposites onto the Tantric chakra system, interpreting manifestation itself as the splitting of unity into polarities, and mystical union as the transcendence of that very structural division.
Campbell, Joseph, Transformations of Myth Through Time, 1990supporting
Their peaceful and wrathful aspects... symbolize the opposites... there is no position without its negation... the opposites condition one another, that they are really one and the same thing.
Jung's foreword to the Tibetan Book of the Great Liberation identifies the peaceful and wrathful deities as symbolic representations of the pairs of opposites and argues for their mutual conditionality, drawing on Lao-Tzu as a parallel formulation.
Evans-Wentz, W. Y., The Tibetan Book of the Great Liberation, 1954supporting
All things arise from opposing, but in some form nonetheless related, drives or forces. Energy is always characterised by the coming together of apparent opposites – apparent because this is how we have conceived things left hemisphere fashion.
McGilchrist argues from neuroscience and mythology that the generative power of opposites is a fundamental feature of reality, critiquing the left-hemispheric tendency to reify apparent oppositions as absolute divisions.
McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting
if the opposing forces in lyre or bow simply annulled one another, the string would go slack – no 'tonus' – and nothing, no flight of notes, no arrow's flight – could come from either.
McGilchrist uses the Heraclitean metaphor of lyre and bow to argue that the opposites must remain in creative tension rather than mutual cancellation, distinguishing dynamic equipoise from bland compromise.
McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting
opposites require to be satisfied together: no single goal can be successfully pursued without due acknowledgment, and indeed acceptance of, its contrary... Somehow life does, out of its total resources, find ways of satisfying opposites at once.
McGilchrist marshals William James to argue that the opposites cannot be sequentially resolved but must be held simultaneously, citing ethical and religious life as the domain where such contradictions are characteristically sustained.
McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting
it tells us what the basic subject of the book is going to be: it's going to be about the opposites. It also tells us that the opposites do two different things: they come together in love and they fight in enmity. They are the dynamo of the coniunctio.
Edinger identifies the opposites as the fundamental subject of the Mysterium Coniunctionis, characterising their dual movement of attraction and enmity as the dynamic engine of the alchemical coniunctio.
Edinger, Edward F., The Mysterium Lectures: A Journey Through C.G. Jung's Mysterium Coniunctionis, 1995supporting
the vital optimum withdraws more and more from the opposing extremes and seeks a middle way, which must naturally be irrational and unconscious, just because the opposites are rational and conscious.
In Psychological Types Jung argues that the irreconcilable tension between rational opposites generates an unconscious, irrational third — a mediating position projected historically as the figure of a saviour or messianic deity.
Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921supporting
The archetypal perspective of the syzygy will always perceive events in compensatory pairings. This must be so, for in 'the realm of the syzygies' 'the One is never separated from the Other'.
Hillman demonstrates that the syzygy — the archetypal pairing of anima and animus — structurally instantiates the pairs-of-opposites logic within analytical psychology's account of contra-sexuality.
Hillman, James, Anima: An Anatomy of a Personified Notion, 1985supporting
In Figure VII the opposites are symbolized by two birds in a wood, one fledged, the other unfledged... the conflict between spirit and body, and in Figure VIII the two birds fighting do in fact represent that conflict.
Jung reads Lambspringk's alchemical illustrations as a systematic symbolisation of different pairs of opposites — soul/spirit, spirit/body — demonstrating how the opus enacts successive differentiations and confrontations of polar principles.
Jung, Carl Gustav, Mysterium Coniunctionis: An Inquiry into the Separation and Synthesis of Psychic Opposites in Alchemy, 1955supporting
the intimate link between the self, as the essence of individuality, and individuation as the process by which that individuality may be realised... Jung contrasts 'the individual' with 'the collective' in both its conscious and unconscious forms.
Papadopoulos traces how the mediation of opposites is intrinsic to Jung's early concept of individuality and later concept of the self, positioning the self as the psychic centre that integrates the individual-collective polarity.
Papadopoulos, Renos K., The Handbook of Jungian Psychology: Theory, Practice and Applications, 2006supporting
Li, fire, and K'an, water, are irreconcilable opposites in the phenomenal world. In the primal relationships, however, their effects do not conflict; on the contrary, they balance each other.
The I Ching commentary distinguishes phenomenal irreconcilability from primal complementarity in its archetypal pairs, offering a cosmological framework parallel to Jung's account of the pairs of opposites in the Pleroma.
Richard Wilhelm, Cary F. Baynes, The I Ching or Book of Changes, 1950aside
The first act of creation is therefore the separation of this divine couple, pushing them sufficiently apart so that a space is created for the rest of creation.
Edinger reads the Egyptian myth of Shu separating Geb and Nut as a cosmogonic image of separatio, offering mythological grounding for the claim that the differentiation of opposites is the precondition of creation itself.
Edinger, Edward F., Anatomy of the Psyche: Alchemical Symbolism in Psychotherapy, 1985aside