Opposite

The term ‘Opposite’ occupies a foundational position in the depth-psychological corpus, functioning not merely as a logical category but as the generative engine of psychic life itself. From the pre-Socratic cosmologists — Anaximander’s pairs locked in mutual penalty and reparation, Heraclitus’s doctrine of flux through tension — through Plato’s Phaedo and the distinction between concrete and essential opposites, to Jung’s systematic elaboration of enantiodromia, compensation, and the transcendent function, the idea that opposites are both mutually conditioning and dynamically productive runs as a red thread across two and a half millennia of psychological thought. Jung, decisively influenced by Hegel’s thesis-antithesis-synthesis and by alchemical imagery, conceived the psyche itself as a self-regulating system whose health depends on the balanced tension between opposing poles: ego and Self, conscious and unconscious, anima and animus, persona and shadow. Pathology arises when one pole dominates to the exclusion of the other. The coniunctio oppositorum — the union of opposites — is thus simultaneously a therapeutic goal and a cosmological principle. McGilchrist extends this insight neurologically and philosophically, arguing that opposites not only co-exist but actively generate one another, remaining distinct yet inseparable like the poles of a magnet. The Tibetan and I Ching traditions contribute further: opposites symbolize primordial forces whose reconciliation, not suppression, is the path toward wholeness. The central tension in the corpus is whether union dissolves distinctness or whether, paradoxically, greater intimacy between opposites produces greater differentiation.

In the library 17 passages

Opposites genuinely coincide while remaining opposites… opposites not only co-exist, but give rise to and fulfil one another (‘sunt complementa’), and are conjoined (like the poles of a magnet) without any intervening boundary, while nonetheless remaining distinct as opposites.

McGilchrist argues that opposites are neither identical (monism) nor merely juxtaposed (dualism) but mutually generative and inseparable, growing more differentiated the more intimately they are united.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Opposites genuinely coincide while remaining opposites. Some philosophies tend to collapse into the monism that opposites are identical; others into the dualism that opposites remain irreconcilable and are merely, at most, juxtaposed.

This passage articulates the epistemological stakes of the concept of opposites, positioning the depth-psychological view between reductive monism and sterile dualism.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Jung did conceive of psychological process in terms of discrimination and then synthesis of opposites. The experience of synthesising the opposites involves a process of balancing or self-regulation… Neurosis can then be seen as unbalanced or one-sided development arising out of the dominance of one of the two sides of the pair.

Samuels explicates Jung’s core thesis that the psyche is a self-regulating system structured by the tension and synthesis of opposites, with neurosis as the pathological consequence of one-sidedness.

Samuels, Andrew, Jung and the Post-Jungians, 1985thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

There is no energy unless there is a tension of opposites; hence it is necessary to discover the opposite to the attitude of the conscious mind.

Jung posits that psychic energy itself is produced by the tension between opposites, making the discovery of the unconscious counterpart to any conscious attitude a therapeutic and energetic necessity.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Two Essays on Analytical Psychology, 1953thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The opposites condition one another, that they are really one and the same thing… the fact that the opposites appear as gods comes from the simple recognition that they are exceedingly powerful.

Drawing on Tibetan Buddhist and Taoist frameworks, this passage presents opposites as numinous, mutually conditioning principles whose archetypal power is expressed in theological imagery.

Evans-Wentz, W. Y., The Tibetan Book of the Great Liberation, 1954thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

‘Good’ and ‘evil’ are opposite poles of a moral judgment which, as such, originates in man. A judgment can be made about a thing only if its opposite is equally real and possible.

Jung argues from psychological experience that moral opposites such as good and evil are co-constitutive: neither pole can be affirmed without granting equal ontological weight to the other.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychology and Religion: West and East, 1958thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

An opposite growing from its opposite and likewise being absorbed again into that opposite… ‘It must be’, for some reason, that the opposites grow into and wane from one another.

Sullivan’s reading of Anaximander establishes a cosmological precedent for the depth-psychological doctrine of enantiodromia: opposites necessarily generate and absorb one another under a law of cosmic necessity.

Sullivan, Shirley Darcus, Psychological and Ethical Ideas What Early Greeks Say, 1995supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Somehow life does, out of its total resources, find ways of satisfying opposites at once… the way to certainty lies through radical doubt; virtue signifies not innocence but the knowledge of sin and its overcoming.

McGilchrist assembles a catena of paradoxes to demonstrate that ethical and spiritual maturity consists in holding opposites in creative tension rather than resolving them through suppression.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

No other opposite which remains the same ever be or become its own opposite, but either passes away or perishes in the change… out of the greater came the less and out of the less the greater, and that opposites were simply generated from opposites.

Plato’s Phaedo distinguishes between concrete opposites that generate one another cyclically and essential opposites that cannot become their own contrary, a distinction foundational to later psychological theorizations.

Plato, Phaedosupporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

A dream does not bring up a figure diametrically opposed to the conscious standpoint. Rather, dream figures modify the ego position… The psyche is a self-regulating system whose aim is not perfection but wholeness and equilibrium.

Nichols refines the crude notion of polar opposition in dreams, arguing that the unconscious offers complementary rather than strictly contrary material, oriented toward wholeness rather than mere negation.

Nichols, Sallie, Jung and Tarot: An Archetypal Journey, 1980supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Something from within, or something from without, is in opposition. It is quite rightly said that the enemy with which consciousness is confronted is secretly double.

Von Franz observes that the opposition consciousness faces is always ambiguous in its origin — inner or outer — and that this doubleness is intrinsic to the structure of conflict itself.

von Franz, Marie-Louise, Alchemy: An Introduction to the Symbolism and the Psychology, 1980supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Li, fire, and K’an, water, are irreconcilable opposites in the phenomenal world. In the primal relationships, however, their effects do not conflict; on the contrary, they balance each other.

The I Ching articulates a cosmological principle directly parallel to Jungian compensation: phenomenal opposites that appear irreconcilable achieve balance at a deeper, primal level of reality.

Richard Wilhelm, Cary F. Baynes, The I Ching or Book of Changes, 1950supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

He consciously believes the opposite of what probably has stayed in the unconscious or in the other world… nothing has been left in the unconscious; nothing, of which he believes the opposite, exists any longer.

Jung demonstrates through clinical dream analysis how the relationship between conscious belief and its unconscious opposite can dissolve when psychological integration is achieved.

Jung, C.G., Dream Interpretation Ancient and Modern: Notes from the Seminar Given in 1936-1941, 2014supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The opposite of an emotion, it would appear, is itself an emotion, rather than, say, the absence of that emotion.

Konstan’s reading of Aristotle’s Rhetoric establishes that for classical thought the opposite of any emotional state is another active emotional state, not mere neutrality — a position anticipating depth-psychological accounts of compensatory affect.

David Konstan, The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature, 2006supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms