Meaning making occupies a pivotal position in depth-psychological and clinical discourse, designating the active, constructive process by which individuals, families, and therapeutic dyads impose coherence on disrupted experience—most urgently in the wake of loss, trauma, and existential crisis. The corpus reveals no single unified theory but rather a productive tension among several orientations. Constructivist and narrative identity researchers, represented most fully by Neimeyer, Singer, and their collaborators, treat meaning making as a fundamentally semiotic and storied endeavor: persons are protagonists who organize discrete events into coherent life narratives, and the capacity to integrate tension-laden memories into such narratives correlates reliably with psychological growth and adjustment. Sensorimotor clinicians such as Ogden extend the concept bodily, insisting that meaning is not merely linguistic but physiological—embedded in posture, breath, and arousal states that constrain or enable the revision of core beliefs. From a Jungian quarter, von Franz radicalizes the term entirely: the realization of meaning is a non-discursive, feeling-toned ‘quantum leap’ in the psyche, irreducible to logical order. Family-systemic thinkers like Nadeau document the co-constructed, intersubjective dimension, showing how families weave competing story-threads into shared mythologies around death. Across all these positions, the question of whether meaning is found or invented—and whether its absence constitutes pathology or simply an as-yet-incomplete search—remains the defining tension of the literature.