Letting Go

Across the depth-psychology corpus, ‘letting go’ emerges not as a single discrete act but as a complex, multi-layered psychospiritual process whose meanings range from the somatic discharge of traumatic activation to the mystical dissolution of ego-identification. The dominant tension runs between the ego’s compulsive need for control — rooted, as Grof and the ACA literature make plain, in early survival strategies — and the transformative release that becomes possible only when that grip is relinquished. Kurtz and Ketcham situate letting go within a broader phenomenology of spiritual release, distinguishing it sharply from mere freedom-seeking: it is received, not achieved. Christina Grof grounds the concept in attachment theory and the spiritual emergency of addiction, arguing that surrender unfolds in increments, ‘one layer at a time.’ The twelve-step literature operationalizes letting go as Step Three’s ‘turn it over,’ linking the gesture to trust in a Higher Power and to the recovery of genuine choice. Welwood extends the term toward contemplative psychology, where the ‘more total letting go’ of spiritual realization completes what psychotherapy begins. Gendlin and Fogel anchor the concept somatically, treating it as the earned outcome of sustained embodied self-awareness rather than a volitional starting point. Taken together, the corpus reveals letting go as structurally paradoxical: it cannot be willed, yet it requires preparation; it is the most intimate of surrenders, yet it opens the individual toward transpersonal depth.

In the library 19 passages

The Buddhist word nirvana actually means to breathe out; letting go is the fundamental attitude of faith… Once we have surrendered a few times, we begin to incorporate the attitude of ‘letting go’ into our daily lives.

Grof argues that letting go is not a single crisis-event but a cumulative spiritual disposition — the very definition of faith — that deepens through repeated acts of surrender and builds trust in the benevolence of the deeper Self.

Grof, Christina, The Thirst for Wholeness: Attachment, Addiction, and the Spiritual Path, 1993thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

‘Letting go’ involves a breaking down of resistance to reality, a surrender of the demand for certitude; it can be pictured as a letting fall of fetters, a shucking of bonds of fear and possessiveness now experienced as no longer binding.

Kurtz defines letting go as the dissolution of the ego’s insistence on certainty and control, framing it in the vivid imagery of chains that can only drop when the individual ceases to identify with them.

Kurtz, Ernest, Ketcham, Katherine, The Spirituality of Imperfection Storytelling and the, 1994thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

We crave release, but we refuse to release — and so long as we cling we are bound… Release, although it involves a true free-ing, is not the same as ‘freedom.’ Freedom cannot be given; it must be won. Release, on the contrary, is experienced rather than ‘gotten.’

Kurtz establishes a crucial conceptual distinction between release (letting go as a received, non-volitional grace) and freedom (an achieved state), insisting that spiritual release cannot be planned or earned.

Kurtz, Ernest, Ketcham, Katherine, The Spirituality of Imperfection Storytelling and the, 1994thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Taking control gives us the illusion of normalcy, and letting go of control seems disastrous. After we have spent years building a citadel of (illusory) strength and security, surrendering o[ur grip].

Grof traces resistance to letting go directly to its adaptive origins in disordered or abusive environments, showing how control becomes psychologically indistinguishable from survival itself.

Grof, Christina, The Thirst for Wholeness: Attachment, Addiction, and the Spiritual Path, 1993thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Psychological work can go a long way toward opening the heart, yet fully awakening the heart requires the more total letting go discovered through spiritual realization.

Welwood situates letting go on a developmental continuum where psychotherapy opens the heart partially but only the ‘more total letting go’ of spiritual realization completes the process of genuine awakening.

Welwood, John, Toward a Psychology of Awakening Buddhism, Psychotherapy,, 2000thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

We realize we are letting go of control when our prayers bring a settling effect to our spirit or emotions when we are troubled. We realize we are letting go when we break our isolation and ask another adult child to listen to our fears or hopes.

The ACA text offers concrete phenomenological markers for letting go — affective settling, broken isolation, honest self-disclosure — translating an abstract spiritual principle into lived behavioral signs.

INC , ACA WSO, ADULT CHILDREN OF ALCOHOLICS DYSFUNCTIONAL FAMILIES, 2012supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Many adult children hoped for God’s grace or intervention, but we never seemed capable of truly letting go and letting God work in our lives. We shamed ourselves for being unable to let go.

The ACA literature documents how shame compounds the very incapacity to let go, creating a self-reinforcing cycle in which the failure to surrender is experienced as moral inadequacy rather than as a conditioned survival response.

INC , ACA WSO, ADULT CHILDREN OF ALCOHOLICS DYSFUNCTIONAL FAMILIES, 2012supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

In Step Three we begin the gradual and gentle process of easing off of stifling control and replacing it with emotional freedom.

The ACA Workbook frames letting go as a gradual, incremental spiritual practice embedded in the structure of the Twelve Steps, replacing fear-based control with the expansiveness of emotional freedom.

Organization, Adult Children of Alcoholics World Service, The twelve steps of adult children steps workbook, 2007supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The Gift of Choice is God’s gift for letting go… By letting go of control, we continue on the path to greater choice.

The workbook reframes letting go teleologically: relinquishing control is not loss but the precondition for genuine agency, with authentic choice emerging precisely where compulsive control had foreclosed it.

Organization, Adult Children of Alcoholics World Service, The twelve steps of adult children steps workbook, 2007supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Individuals with the strongest attachments are also the ones who experience the most difficulty letting go into death. The way out of this predicament is to recognize that ultimately we do not own anything.

Grof extends the principle of letting go to confrontations with mortality, arguing that the degree of attachment directly predicts the difficulty of releasing — from both objects and the body itself.

Grof, Christina, The Thirst for Wholeness: Attachment, Addiction, and the Spiritual Path, 1993supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Why let go of who we think we are? From one point of view, we may feel we have a lot to lose. However, from a slightly different angle, in disengaging from our limitations, we have everything to gain.

Grof reframes the apparent cost of letting go as illusory, arguing that the persona of ‘who we think we are’ is itself the obstacle to transformation rather than a legitimate possession to be protected.

Grof, Christina, The Thirst for Wholeness: Attachment, Addiction, and the Spiritual Path, 1993supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Letting go is not the way to start the journey to embodied self-awareness but rather the result of engaging in all the prior steps listed in Table 1.1. Letting go is earned by practice and requires embodied self-awareness.

Fogel offers a somatic corrective to voluntarist accounts of letting go, insisting it is a developmental achievement — the organic result of sustained interoceptive practice — rather than an initiating decision.

Fogel, Alan, Body Sense: The Science and Practice of Embodied Self-Awareness, 2009supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

DELIBERATE LETTING-GO… there are two opposite extremes that don’t often produce useful results. One is the attitude of strict control… The other extreme is that of never wanting to direct or control feelings.

Gendlin identifies deliberate letting go as an intermediate therapeutic stance distinct from both rigid control and passive dissolution, situating it as a precise somatic skill within the Focusing method.

Gendlin, Eugene T., Focusing: How to Gain Direct Access to Your Body’s Knowledge, 2010supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

This dance requires being able to flow continuously back and forth between polar opposites — between coming together and moving apart, taking hold and letting go, engaging and allowing space.

Welwood positions letting go as one pole of a relational dialectic in intimate relationship, a rhythmic capacity that must alternate with engagement rather than serving as a permanent orientation.

Welwood, John, Toward a Psychology of Awakening Buddhism, Psychotherapy,, 2000supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Conscious forgetting means willfully dropping the practice of obsessing, intentionally outdistancing and losing sight of it… This kind of forgetting does not erase memory, it lays the emotion surrounding the memory to rest.

Estés recasts a specific form of letting go — conscious forgetting as active refusal to rehearse injury — distinguishing it from repression by emphasizing intentional disengagement from affective repetition.

Clarissa Pinkola Estés, Ph D, Women Who Run With the Wolves Myths and Stories of the Wild, 2017supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Then the Self asks the part if it is ready to let go of its burdens… everything surrounding the process of unburdening is negotiable.

Schwartz operationalizes letting go within the IFS model as ‘unburdening’ — a readiness-dependent, negotiated process in which exiled parts release embedded traumatic material at their own pace.

Schwartz, Richard C, Internal Family Systems Therapy, 1995supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The ability to let go of pretenses and expectations and the ability to laugh at oneself… the growth of spirituality in terms of acceptance of one’s limitations and strengths.

Fogel includes letting go of pretenses among the markers of psychological maturity, linking it to the capacity for self-compassion, humor, and genuine spiritual development.

Fogel, Alan, Body Sense: The Science and Practice of Embodied Self-Awareness, 2009aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms