Release

Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Release’ occupies a conceptually rich and theologically charged position, functioning simultaneously as a phenomenological event, a spiritual category, and a somatic process. Kurtz and Ketcham’s sustained treatment of Release as the primary modality of spirituality establishes the term’s most theoretically developed usage: Release is not freedom earned but grace received, not a triumph of will but a dissolution of resistance, experienced most purely when truth is permitted to reveal itself rather than seized. This stands in productive tension with Peter Levine’s somatic rendering, where release denotes the physiological discharge of bound traumatic energy—the involuntary trembling and breath-shift that reconstitutes organic self-regulation. The I Ching’s Hexagram 40 (Xie) contributes an archetypal cosmological dimension, framing release as the proper response to dissolution of adversity, a return to right order. James Hollis extends the term into the domain of guilt and self-forgiveness, arguing that genuine release of soul follows only from sincere contrition and symbolic recompense. Estes treats release as an element within a larger cycle of conscious forgetting and forgiveness. Across these authors, a central tension persists: Release as an involuntary gift versus release as disciplined practice, and release as psychological phenomenon versus release as spiritual grace. The term coheres around the shared conviction that binding—whether traumatic, moral, or libidinal—precedes and necessitates release.

In the library 13 passages

Release, although it involves a true free-ing, is not the same as ‘freedom.’ Freedom cannot be given; it must be won. Release, on the contrary, is experienced rather than ‘gotten,’ received rather than attained.

Kurtz and Ketcham establish Release as the foundational mode of spiritual experience, distinguishing it categorically from achieved freedom by characterizing it as a received, passive, grace-like event that emerges from authentic self-disclosure.

Kurtz, Ernest, Ketcham, Katherine, The Spirituality of Imperfection Storytelling and the, 1994thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

‘Letting go’ involves a breaking down of resistance to reality, a surrender of the demand for certitude; it can be pictured as a letting fall of fetters, a shucking of bonds of fear and possessiveness now experienced as no longer binding.

Release is here parsed as the psychic act of relinquishing attachment to certainty and possessiveness, with the paradox that the chains cannot fall while one remains attached to them.

Kurtz, Ernest, Ketcham, Katherine, The Spirituality of Imperfection Storytelling and the, 1994thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Release begins to happen when we lay aside the idea that we can plan spirituality—for ourselves or for anyone else.

Kurtz and Ketcham argue that Release is universally available but structurally incompatible with deliberate planning, arising instead through openness to unexpected moments of grace in ordinary human experience.

Kurtz, Ernest, Ketcham, Katherine, The Spirituality of Imperfection Storytelling and the, 1994thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

As one’s passive responses are replaced by active ones in the exit from immobility, a particular physiological process occurs: one experiences waves of involuntary shaking and trembling, followed by spontaneous changes in breathing—from tight and shallow to deep and relaxed.

Levine articulates release as a somatic discharge process wherein bound traumatic energy is dissipated through involuntary trembling and shifts in breathing, using a physics analogy of a spring releasing potential energy.

Levine, Peter A., In an Unspoken Voice: How the Body Releases Trauma and Restores Goodness, 2010thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Such forgiveness of self, with sincere contrition, symbolic recompense and then release, is rare. Most of us do not achieve personal forgiveness, and the elan of the second half of life is seriously eroded by the adhering consequences of the first.

Hollis situates release within the moral economy of self-forgiveness, arguing that it is the terminal act in a sequence of contrition and recompense and that its rarity accounts for the diminished vitality of the second half of life.

Hollis, James, Swamplands of the Soul: New Life in Dismal Places, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Release is such that it is fitting to travel southwest. When one dispels trouble and rescues a dangerous situation, it is fitting to extend such a thing to the masses.

The I Ching’s Hexagram 40 frames Release cosmologically as the appropriate response to the dissolution of adversity, signifying restoration of right order and the extension of that liberation outward to the community.

Wang Bi, Richard John Lynn, The Classic of Changes: A New Translation of the I Ching as Interpreted by Wang Bi, 1994supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

It is important to remember that a ‘final’ forgiveness is not surrender. It is a conscious decision to cease to harbor resentment, which includes forgiving a debt and giving up one’s resolve to retaliate.

Estés positions release as the culminating act of a graduated forgiveness process, distinguishing it from capitulation and framing it as an exercise of conscious agency over the emotional residue of harm.

Clarissa Pinkola Estés, Ph D, Women Who Run With the Wolves Myths and Stories of the Wild, 2017supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Both Rohr and Reuter emphasize the psychological and emotional attachments that can devastate our spiritual lives, making the point that ‘attachment’ does not have to be to material things to be spiritually destructive.

This passage develops the theoretical precondition for release by identifying layered libidinal and emotional attachments—to power, sensation, and knowledge—as the bonds from which spiritual release must free the psyche.

Kurtz, Ernest, Ketcham, Katherine, The Spirituality of Imperfection Storytelling and the, 1994supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The essence of therapy is the acknowledgment of responsibility for one’s choices, for one’s life. Anything else is an evasion of genuine adulthood.

Hollis argues that the precondition for psychological release from guilt is not projection or denial but a shattering acknowledgment of personal responsibility, linking therapeutic release to the assumption of mature agency.

Hollis, James, Swamplands of the Soul: New Life in Dismal Places, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

At the very core of the anger-out theory and work is the notion of catharsis, which remains a controversial topic in therapeutic practice, despite evidence that i

Masters’s discussion of catharsis engages the related debate about whether emotional release through direct expression constitutes genuine therapeutic resolution or merely a form of discharge that bypasses deeper transformation.

Masters, Robert Augustus, Spiritual Bypassing When Spirituality Disconnects Us From, 2012aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Active escape, on the other hand, is exhilarating. Children become excited by their small triumphs and often show pleasure by glowing with smiles, clapping their hands or laughing heartily.

Levine differentiates avoidance from active escape as a form of embodied release, noting that successful discharge in traumatic play is marked by affective exhilaration rather than the distress characteristic of continued binding.

Levine, Peter A., In an Unspoken Voice: How the Body Releases Trauma and Restores Goodness, 2010aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms