Within the depth-psychology corpus, 'Judgment' occupies a complex conceptual territory that spans at least four distinct registers: eschatological, psychological, ethical-political, and linguistic-structural. The ascetic and patristic literature collected under Sinkewicz treats judgment primarily as a postmortem divine verdict whose vivid imaginative anticipation—the *memoria mortis* tradition—serves as a paraenetic and therapeutic instrument, anchoring monastic practice in fear of condemnation and hope of vindication. In the Tarot tradition (Pollack, Nichols, Hamaker-Zondag, Jodorowsky, Banzhaf), the Judgment card (Arcanum XX) becomes a depth-psychological archetype of awakening, rebirth, and the call to authentic selfhood, often interpreted through Jungian lenses of individuation and confrontation with unconscious depths. A third register emerges in political philosophy, particularly through Hannah Arendt's faculty of judgment as reconstructed in the Hannah corpus: here judgment is irreducibly singular, resistant to rule-governed reduction, and constitutive of genuine moral responsibility—a faculty distinct from cognition and immune to the excuses of obedience to principle. The Stoic tradition (Graver) treats judgment as a cognitive assent constitutive of emotion, making it the hinge between reason and affect. Benveniste's etymological analysis grounds all these usages in an Indo-European root denoting authoritative disclosure. Together, these strands reveal judgment as simultaneously cognitive act, eschatological event, individuating summons, and political-ethical capacity.
In the library
20 passages
Because our judgments cannot be fully explained as the necessary consequence of any set of rules or principles, the responsibility for them cannot be placed on any such rules.
Arendt's faculty of judgment is irreducibly individual and cannot be delegated to external principles, making the person—not any rule—the final locus of moral responsibility for every particular judgment.
Hannah, Barbara, Encounters with the Soul: Active Imagination as Developed by C. G. Jung, 1981thesis
ascetic conceptions of judgment always have two sides—positive (vindication/beatitude) and negative (condemnation/punishment)... death connects the two through judgment.
In Desert Father asceticism, eschatological judgment is structurally binary—vindication versus condemnation—and death functions as the hinge that renders its verdict irrevocable.
Sinkewicz, Robert E., Evagrius of Pontus: The Greek Ascetic Corpus, 2003thesis
death and faults, considered as mortality and coming judgment are also that about which one must mourn... The monk weeps because death will take him, prepared or not, and so his time for repentance is limited.
Climacus yokes mortality and coming judgment as the twin objects of monastic mourning, establishing the practitioner's awareness of limited time for repentance as a spiritual motive force.
Sinkewicz, Robert E., Evagrius of Pontus: The Greek Ascetic Corpus, 2003thesis
memory of judgment functions paraenetically by reminding the monk of the punishments that await sinners... More than paraenesis, though, judgment metaphysically underpins present events.
Climacus elevates the memory of divine judgment beyond moral exhortation to a metaphysical principle that structures the meaning of daily monastic experience.
Sinkewicz, Robert E., Evagrius of Pontus: The Greek Ascetic Corpus, 2003thesis
Morality concerns the individual in his singularity. The criterion of right and wrong... depends in the last analysis neither on habits and customs... nor on a command of either divine or human origin, but on what I decide with regard to myself.
Arendt locates the ground of moral judgment in radical individual singularity, severing it from communal custom and divine or human command alike.
Hannah, Barbara, Encounters with the Soul: Active Imagination as Developed by C. G. Jung, 1981thesis
Very commonly the Great Old Men connect mortality and judgment within the same conceptual space. Barsanuphius writes succinctly...
The Gaza school fuses the contemplation of death's nearness with postmortem judgment into a single conceptual and spiritual practice, following and intensifying earlier Desert tradition.
Sinkewicz, Robert E., Evagrius of Pontus: The Greek Ascetic Corpus, 2003supporting
the judgments involved in emotion are sufficient conditions for the corresponding psychophysical changes, but not that they are necessary conditions.
Chrysippus's Stoic theory casts cognitive judgment as a sufficient but not necessary cause of emotion, allowing for affective responses that do not derive from rational assent.
Imagine that horrible and fearful judgment. Bring to mind the things reserved for sinners... Then also bring to mind the good things stored up for the righteous.
Evagrius prescribes a meditative visualization of eschatological judgment—its terrors for sinners and rewards for the righteous—as a structured practice for motivating ascetic perseverance.
Sinkewicz, Robert E., Evagrius of Pontus: The Greek Ascetic Corpus, 2003supporting
A politics in which citizens decline to judge is therefore a politics of entertainment. Arendt viewed such a politics as a grave threat in mass democracies.
Arendt argues that the abdication of the faculty of judgment in democratic citizens transforms politics into passive spectacle, threatening the foundations of genuine political life.
Hannah, Barbara, Encounters with the Soul: Active Imagination as Developed by C. G. Jung, 1981supporting
the judgment of death was not Antony's, but God's, who passed judgment concerning him who died and revealed and uncovered the situation of the one who lived.
In Athanasian hagiography, the manner and timing of a monk's death is attributed directly to divine judgment, transforming physical death into a theological disclosure.
Sinkewicz, Robert E., Evagrius of Pontus: The Greek Ascetic Corpus, 2003supporting
Enlightenment is not the outcome of an intellectual process in which one idea follows another in sequence finally to terminate in conclusion or judgment. There is neither process nor judgment in Enlightenment.
Suzuki explicitly defines Zen Enlightenment as the state prior to and presupposed by judgment, positioning satori as a ground from which discursive cognitive acts—including judgment—arise but which itself transcends them.
Suzuki, Daisetz Teitaro, Essays in Zen Buddhism (First Series), 1949thesis
the incorporation of visions of judgment points forward to the kind of vivid speculations that we will see among the Desert Fathers, and especially in Climacus' Ladder.
Athanasius's inclusion of eschatological judgment visions in the Life of Antony inaugurates a tradition of increasingly elaborate and influential judgment imagery throughout Desert and Byzantine ascetic literature.
Sinkewicz, Robert E., Evagrius of Pontus: The Greek Ascetic Corpus, 2003supporting
The meaning of this Arcanum consists of discovering, through therapeutic work or other means, that every individual being that is born is absolutely wanted by the deity (or the universe) that allowed him or her to be engendered.
Jodorowsky interprets Tarot Arcanum XX (Judgment) as a therapeutic archetype of cosmic affirmation, whose depth-psychological meaning is the resolution of existential rejection through the discovery of unconditional divine or universal acceptance.
Jodorowsky, Alejandro, The Way of Tarot: The Spiritual Teacher in the Cards, 2004supporting
only the judge can dicere ius... do, dico, addico. He has the right to 'give,' to 'announce certain rules' and to 'adjudge.'
Benveniste traces Latin *iudex* and the formula *do, dico, addico* to demonstrate that judgment in Indo-European legal culture is fundamentally an act of authoritative pronouncement reserved to a specific institutional role.
Benveniste, Émile, Indo European Language and Society, 1973supporting
The Elusiveness of Arendtian Judgment... how would the advice to choose one's imagined company and 'woo the consent' of everyone in it actually proceed, and how might it have awakened his conscience?
The passage interrogates the practical mechanism of Arendt's representative thinking as a basis for judgment, focusing on whether imagined intersubjectivity can actually guide individual moral conscience in extreme cases.
Hannah, Barbara, Encounters with the Soul: Active Imagination as Developed by C. G. Jung, 1981supporting
I think it best to reserve judgment as to the stand Posidonius actually took in relation to his Stoic predecessor.
Graver counsels scholarly suspension of judgment regarding Posidonius's relationship to Chrysippean psychology in the absence of definitive evidence, modeling epistemically careful use of the term in academic discourse.
Margaret Graver, Stoicism and Emotion, 2007supporting
of all kinds of knowledge the knowledge of good laws has the greatest power of improving the learner... the righteous judge ought to have in his mind as the antidote of all other words.
Plato in the Laws positions the judge's internalization of good laws as the epistemological and ethical antidote to corrupting discourse, making sound judgment inseparable from legislative wisdom.
In her right hand she holds the sword that is raised to pass and execute judgment. The right portion of the throne can be seen... law and justice are related to the right side, which is considered the rational, conscious side.
Banzhaf interprets the Justice card's sword as the instrument of judgment aligned with rational consciousness and Dike's civic order, situating judgment within the hero's journey as a threshold of full personal responsibility.
Banzhaf, Hajo, Tarot and the Journey of the Hero, 2000supporting
THE JUDGEMENT—CARD XX The joy of living, such an integral part of The Sun, becomes deeply anchored in the psyche with positive encouragement, and awakens new feeling.
Hamaker-Zondag reads Tarot Card XX (Judgment) as a psychic deepening of the vitality established by the Sun card, linking the Judgment archetype to a newly awakened affective and spiritual renewal.
Hamaker-Zondag, Karen, Tarot as a Way of Life: A Jungian Approach to the Tarot, 1997aside
I shall be tried just as a physician would be tried in a court of little boys at the indictment of the cook.
Socrates employs the analogy of a physician judged by children to argue that a court incapable of evaluating true benefit will necessarily render false judgment, foregrounding the epistemological preconditions for legitimate judicial authority.