Orientation
Death occupies a singular position across the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as biological fact, psychological catalyst, existential horizon, and archetypal figure. Yalom’s existential psychotherapy erects the entire edifice of his clinical theory upon the premise that death anxiety is a primary, irreducible source of psychopathology and that conscious confrontation with mortality—rather than its avoidance—is the engine of therapeutic transformation. Against this clinical framework, Hillman’s archetypal psychology treats death less as a terminus to be managed than as a dimension of soul, insisting that the psyche has its own experiential relationship to dying that neither theology nor rationalist philosophy adequately captures. The Tibetan and Vedantic traditions, represented through Evans-Wentz and Easwaran, render death a structured passage requiring spiritual preparation; the bardos and the Upanishadic teaching on the deathless Self reframe mortality as initiatory rather than merely terminal. The Tarot corpus—Nichols, Pollack, Jodorowsky—offers death as archetypal symbol: the skeleton with scythe on Trump XIII encodes transformation, renewal, and androgynous dissolution of ego. Von Franz situates the God of Death within archetypal time as a split-off dark aspect of the divine, operating through depression and decay. Taken together, these voices articulate a field-wide consensus that death is not the negation of psychological life but one of its most generative conditions.