Within the depth-psychology corpus, Justice emerges as one of the most philosophically charged terms in the archive, traversing cosmological, ethical, psychological, and symbolic registers simultaneously. Sullivan’s exhaustive survey of Archaic Greek thought traces the term from Homer and Hesiod—where justice (dike) is a divine force honoured by Zeus, separating humanity from the animal realm and guaranteeing cosmic order—through the Presocratics, where Parmenides and Heraclitus reconceive justice as the principle that preserves ontological and elemental balance. In the Platonic corpus, justice migrates inward: it becomes the ordering principle of the tripartite soul and the structural foundation of the ideal state, collapsing the distinction between political and psychic health. The Tarot commentators—Nichols, Pollack, Jodorowsky, Banzhaf, Place—inherit this dual legacy and amplify its archetypal resonance: Justice as Arcanum VIII (or XI) is simultaneously goddess Dike, weigher of the soul, and an invitation to rigorous self-evaluation. Nichols, drawing on Hillman, insists that Solomonic judgment is an operation of the feeling function, not ratiocination. Tensions persist throughout: between justice as cosmic law and as human achievement, between punitive and restorative registers, between the inevitability of justice’s triumph and the scandalous spectacle of innocent suffering. The term is never merely juridical; it is always also a question of inner proportion and existential accountability.