Hierarchy, as encountered across the depth-psychology corpus, operates on at least three distinct registers that seldom collapse into one another: the neurophysiological, the socio-ritual, and the cosmological. In the polyvagal literature — chiefly Dana and Porges — hierarchy names the phylogenetically ordered sequence of autonomic circuits (dorsal vagal, sympathetic, ventral vagal) that govern self-regulation and social engagement. This evolutionary hierarchy is not a static rank but a dynamic ladder traversed moment to moment; befriending it becomes a therapeutic act. Turner’s ritual-process work inverts the sociological valence: structural hierarchy is precisely what communitas dissolves and then reconstitutes, purified, at the year’s turning. Neumann, drawing on Jungian archetypal theory, locates hierarchy in the totem’s formative authority over collective life — hierarchy as the social expression of an archetype. The Stoic and Aristotelian background surveyed by Inwood positions hierarchy within a scala naturae in which higher powers entail lower ones, and deliberate human action stands at the apex. Jung and Kerényi add the Olympian register: the divine hierarchy of Homer fixes each god’s relations, yet the childhood of the gods — and figures like Hermes — persist outside it, marking a more archaic, fluid stratum. Van der Hart’s trauma theory contributes a clinical hierarchy of action tendencies, where traumatization is understood as fixation at unduly primitive levels. Across these registers, hierarchy is less a rigid taxonomy than a living, contested structure whose disruption — through ritual, neurological dysregulation, or trauma — simultaneously threatens and regenerates meaning.