Embodied Selfhood occupies a contested and generative position across the depth-psychology corpus, drawing together neurobiological, phenomenological, developmental, and hermeneutic traditions into a shared concern: what it means for selfhood to be constituted through, not merely housed within, the living body. Alan Fogel’s sustained contribution establishes embodied self-awareness as a foundational psychophysiological capacity—one that can be impaired by trauma and relational rupture and must be actively restored through interpersonal and somatic practice. Shaun Gallagher’s phenomenological account situates the embodied self prior to reflective consciousness, grounding it in proprioceptive-kinesthetic structures, body schema, and the infant’s pre-reflective differentiation of self from world. Evan Thompson, working from enactivism and autopoietic biology, traces selfhood to the organism’s structural coupling with its environment, in which meaning is enacted rather than processed. Paul Ricoeur offers a contrasting accent: the self achieves identity through narrative, yet the body remains the locus of passivity, memory, and attestation that anchors the ‘who’ of personal continuity. Across these figures, a central tension persists between the pre-reflective, sub-personal substrate of embodied selfhood and the higher-order narrative or conceptual layers that articulate it. The stakes are clinical and philosophical alike: impairment of embodied self-awareness, Fogel insists, underlies the lasting effects of psychological trauma, while Gallagher demonstrates that disruptions to body schema—phantom limbs, neuro-developmental anomaly—illuminate the otherwise invisible architecture on which selfhood rests.