Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘continuous’ functions as a term of profound ontological consequence rather than mere descriptive convenience. The passages reveal a sustained tension between continuity as the primordial substrate of reality and discreteness as a secondary, derivative phenomenon. McGilchrist, drawing on quantum field theory and Bergson, argues that underlying unity is fundamentally continuous — particles being ripples in continuous fields — while discreteness emerges secondarily from that ground. Bergson’s dictum that ‘all change, all movement’ is ‘absolutely indivisible’ anchors a process-philosophy in which continuity constitutes the very essence of duration, time, and motion. Simondon complicates this by inverting the hierarchy: for him, the discontinuous is ontologically prior, and continuity emerges as a functional equivalence of sufficiently disorganized discontinuity. Von Franz and Hillman approach continuity through psychological development: feeling-time, unlike clock-time, is organized in qualitative clusters, yet continuity remains ‘essential for feeling development.’ McGilchrist synthesizes these polarities through Schelling’s stream image, insisting we require ‘continuity and discontinuity together.’ The theological tradition, as represented by John of Damascus, deploys the continuous/discontinuous distinction to adjudicate the natures of Christ. Across all these registers, the term marks the boundary between analytic decomposition and living process — the point at which reduction destroys what it seeks to understand.