The term ‘process’ occupies a constitutive position across depth-psychological discourse, functioning simultaneously as a descriptive category for observable therapeutic sequences and as a quasi-ontological claim about the nature of psychic life itself. In group-psychotherapeutic literature, particularly Yalom’s, process designates the relational and meta-communicative dimension of group interaction — what is happening between persons as distinct from the content of what is said. Flores, following Yalom, specifies this duality as content versus the reflective sequential illumination of events, locating process as the ‘power cell’ of therapeutic work in the here-and-now. A wholly different register appears in Roesler’s and Stein’s analytical-psychological writing, where ‘process’ names the transformative itinerary of the psyche — a staged, purposive movement from unconscious matrix toward individuation and Self-emergence, whose archetypal grammar Jung drew from alchemy. Edinger’s readings of alchemical operations (calcinatio, mortificatio, separatio) map process as sequential psychic ordeal. Bulkeley, drawing on Freud, distinguishes primary from secondary process as two fundamental modes of mental functioning, grounding the concept neuropsychologically. The central tension in the corpus lies between process as technique — a therapist’s interventional skill — and process as autonomous teleological movement of the psyche itself, a tension that mirrors the broader dialectic between agency and surrender running through depth-psychological thought.